En mai 1999, le requérant déménagea dans un autre quartier d'Athènes.

Jebens,   Mr   G. Malinverni, judges,   and Mr   A.

Jebens, judges ,   and Mr S.

In case of disagreement on the scope of that obligation or on the manner of its discharge it was open to the applicants to seek a judicial determination of these matters which, as it appears from the Government's

Jebens, judges , and   Mr   S.

La société Aviva Assurances et la société Sotrav ont interjeté appel de ce jugement le 24 mars 2021, intimant la SPL Eau du Bassin Rennais, la SMABTP et la société Roissy TP.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Akhmatkhanovy v.

The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. A.

    Dans ses observations du 22 mars 2006, la requérante produisit une «   déclaration   », signée le 20 mars 2006, par M e A.F., qui affirmait qu'   «   étant député, il

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Akyazıcı v.

    The applicant’s detention in March 1999 8.

Jebens,   Mr   G. Malinverni, judges, and Mr S.

On 17 March 2005 the Guba District Court found the applicant guilty and sentenced him to two years' imprisonment.

    During three periods (between 8 December 1998 and 1 March 1999, between 21 March and 28 April 2000, and between 15 January and 11 April 2001) no hearings were scheduled because the judge

It became final on 2 March 2009. 14.

Hearings were held on 15 June 2004, 14, 15 and 16 September 2004, 15 October 2004, 18 and 19 October 2004, 18 May 2006, 12 June 2006 and 29 March 2007.

    Procedure and composition of the Court   The application was lodged on 3 November 2000 and declared admissible on 11 March 2004.

  In   May 2005 the Uzbek authorities issued an arrest warrant in respect of the applicant who they suspected of being involved in anti-constitutional activities.

    In the period from 30 May 2001 to 2 March 2004 the applicant was detained in remand prison IZ-47/1 of St   Petersburg. 1.     The applicant's account 11.