Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1115DEC003624107
15 novembre 2011
15 novembre 2011
On 8 June 2006 the applicant was surrendered by the Austrian authorities to their Hungarian counterpart.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0706DEC002353005
6 juillet 2010
6 juillet 2010
The Bulgarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs S. Atanasova, of the Ministry of Justice.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0930DEC003496004
30 septembre 2008
30 septembre 2008
Their wording ... shows their political character. ...The organisation says that it is a successor of and continues the 'national liberation struggle of the Macedonian nation', including the 'Macedonian
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1022DEC001638408
22 octobre 2013
22 octobre 2013
The Court decided to consider this aspect of the case together with the question of legal assistance to the applicant at the appeal hearing. The relevant parts of Article 6 read as follows: “1.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2872245-3149871
24 septembre 2009
24 septembre 2009
The Court thus went on to examine whether there had been a violation of that right.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0710DEC005378808
10 juillet 2012
10 juillet 2012
Even if the spelling “ Emilii Plater ” was preferred by the Polish minorities living in the area, this did not remove the municipality’s obligation to comply with the legal requirements for the official
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0928DEC000244204
28 septembre 2010
28 septembre 2010
Accordingly, in the present case the six ‑ month period for introducing the application before the Court started to run on 5 February 2003, when the applicant received a notification that this judgment
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-188700
6 décembre 2018
6 décembre 2018
(hereinafter “the Convention”); Having regard to the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (“the Court”) in the Nevmerzhitsky, Yakovenko, Logvinenko, Isayev and Melnik groups of cases
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0120DEC000037806
20 janvier 2009
20 janvier 2009
THE LAW The applicants complained under Articles 8 and 6 of the Convention about the withdrawal of their parental custody of their son and about the conduct of the custody proceedings in the domestic courts
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0401DEC000032603
1 avril 2008
1 avril 2008
The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Y. Zaytsev. A. The circumstances of the case The applicant is a pensioner.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1021DEC007402201
21 octobre 2008
21 octobre 2008
The grounds for this decision remain unknown. 3.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0518DEC002496894
18 mai 1995
18 mai 1995
down in the Aliens Act, the regulations implementing this Act, and the Circular on Aliens.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0401DEC002853522
1 avril 2025
1 avril 2025
The Court considers that the applicants’ criminal conviction constituted an interference with their right to freedom of expression under Article 10 § 1 of the Convention.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0108JUD000913406
8 janvier 2013
8 janvier 2013
The facts of the present case therefore fall within the scope of this provision. 48.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1014DEC003150306
14 octobre 2008
14 octobre 2008
In this connection, the Court considers that the domestic courts did everything in their power to duly involve the applicant in their decision-making procedure.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1219JUD005529907
19 décembre 2013
19 décembre 2013
When remanding the applicants in custody, the domestic authorities referred to the gravity of the charges against them and their character.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2194580-2344521
29 novembre 2007
29 novembre 2007
The criminal proceedings brought against the applicants concerning their involvement in the violent clashes on 11 January 1998 ended with their acquittal. 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0610JUD001931506
10 juin 2010
10 juin 2010
In support of their request they submitted a copy of the return receipts bearing the detention centre's receipt stamp and their signatures (see paragraph 9 above). This request remained unanswered.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1113DEC002731404
13 novembre 2008
13 novembre 2008
In its view, this amount would constitute adequate redress and sufficient compensation for the impugned length of the said proceedings, and thus a reasonable sum as to quantum in the present case in the
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0115JUD000845506
15 janvier 2013
15 janvier 2013
Thus, in both sets of domestic proceedings the applicants declared themselves to be the owners of the photo laboratory in question and their position as such was not contested (see paragraphs 15 and 26
Source officiellePage 18 sur 127