CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

11 354 résultats pour « Destailleur »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2253

Admin. suprême

12 février 2008

12 février 2008

courts had based their decisions on custody and access on relevant grounds, the Court observed that the German authorities had carefully examined the applicants’ situation and given their reasons in detailed

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56147

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2002

21 octobre 2002

of the respondent state had paid the applicants the sum provided for in the friendly settlement, Recalling that the structural problems at the root of the present application are the subject of a detailed

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56146

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2002

21 octobre 2002

of the respondent state had paid the applicants the sum provided for in the friendly settlement, Recalling that the structural problems at the root of the present application are the subject of a detailed

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-180736

Admin. suprême

19 janvier 2018

19 janvier 2018

The Government are requested to provide detailed information as regards the subsequent conduct of domestic courts’ proceedings upon granting an application for leave to appeal out of time. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-248740

Admin. suprême

19 janvier 2026

19 janvier 2026

  The Government are invited to provide a detailed report on the applicant’s prison regime, in particular as regards the time he has been allowed to spend outside his cell, and the visits, both since

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-243381

Admin. suprême

30 avril 2025

30 avril 2025

The court examined the conclusions in that communication and found them detailed, clear and well-substantiated.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0616DEC004001208

Admin. suprême

16 juin 2011

16 juin 2011

On 31 May 2010 the Court decided to give notice to the Government of the applicants’ complaints detailed above.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-244499

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2025

9 juillet 2025

The applicant further emphasises that during this time the municipality has not adopted a detailed spatial plan and has not taken any measures to counterbalance the interference with his right to property

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0920DEC003069305

Admin. suprême

20 septembre 2011

20 septembre 2011

The Chamber further decided to give notice to the Government of the applicants’ complaints detailed above.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6620

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 1999

5 octobre 1999

On the basis of a very detailed report of the investigation (itself drawn up on the basis of forensic reports) and of evidence from some sixty witnesses, the public prosecutor concluded that it had been

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0517DEC000368313

Admin. suprême

17 mai 2016

17 mai 2016

On 24   November 2014 the Court decided to give notice to the Government of the applicant’s complaints detailed above. In accordance with the pilot judgment Gerasimov and Others v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0605DEC004514010

Admin. suprême

5 juin 2018

5 juin 2018

On 1 July 2014 the Court decided to give notice to the Government of the applicant’s complaint detailed above.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10439

Admin. suprême

19 avril 1994

19 avril 1994

Article   6   §   1 obliges courts to give reasons for their decisions, but cannot be understood as requiring a detailed answer to every argument — nor is the European Court called upon

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0606DEC004651718

Admin. suprême

6 juin 2019

6 juin 2019

On 12 December 2018 the Court decided to give notice to the Government of the applicant’s complaints detailed above.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-149178

Admin. suprême

1 décembre 2014

1 décembre 2014

    On 8 August 2014 the applicant’s lawyer sent another enquiry to the prosecutor, requesting more detailed information about the already undertaken and planned investigative measures in relation

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3233

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2006

27 juin 2006

The advertisement mentioned his age and year of birth, gave a detailed description of his physical characteristics, a link to the web page he had at the time with his picture on it, as well as his phone

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2495

Admin. suprême

20 septembre 2007

20 septembre 2007

The applicants had not provided any detailed information as to whether measures had been taken at the relevant time to try to prevent the feud from being executed, whether the threats had been reported

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0104DEC001872706

Admin. suprême

4 janvier 2007

4 janvier 2007

In late December 2005 the counsel for the Lord Advocate provided a detailed explanation for the failure to prosecute D.S., variously at a meeting on 21 December, in written answers to the petition and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1022DEC002897895

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 1997

22 octobre 1997

   presented during the (1990) jury trial, the two statements,       which are referred to in the indictment, contain       particularly detailed

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1012DEC002547005

Admin. suprême

12 octobre 2010

12 octobre 2010

The police also obtained a detailed transcript of the telephone communications of all the members of the group over a period of several months from which it appeared that the pattern of communication between

Source officielle

Page 18 sur 568

← PrécédentSuivant →