59696/00, § 135, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts); Bannikova v. Russia , no.   18757/06, §§   48-50, 4   November 2010; Veselov and Others v.

in Bratislava     Eva ATANAŠČINOVÁ, who was born in 1951 and lives in Bratislava     Dana BAJZOVÁ, who was born in 1964 and lives in Bratislava     Dana BALAJOVÁ

    There were, accordingly, objective suspicions that the applicant had been involved in criminal activity and was predisposed to commit a criminal offence ( see Bannikova v.

Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, 16/03/2020, RUB 50,000 (approximately EUR   600) 3,400     24955/20 20/05/2020 Lyubov Vladimirovna BABIKOVA 1995 Selikhanova Alina Alanovna Moscow

  Russia , nos. 23200/10, 24009/07 and 556/10, 2 October 2012; Bannikova v. Russia , no. 18757/06, 14 October 2010; Vanyan v. Russia , no. 53203/99, 15   December 2005; Khudobin v.

  18002/02, §§   52 and 53, 16 July 2009; and Bannikova v. Russia , no.   18757/06, §§   33 ‑ 65, 4 November 2010). 22.

) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   50664/22 30/09/2022 Dmitriy Yevgenyevich POPOV 1993   Baranova

of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   4,000   50123/22 13/10/2022 Aleksandr Anatolyevich STREPETOV 1968 Nataliya Andreyevna Baranova

administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000     20410/21 16/03/2021 Natalya Petrovna BARANOVA

- lack of impartiality of tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   30801/22 09/06/2022 Gleb Yuryevich LEVOCHKIN 1992 Baranova

Alekseyevich GLAZKOV 1975   Stanislav Yuryevich KARMAKSKIKH 1986   Petr Andreyevich SAMSONOV 1990   Aleksandr Nikolayevich SHRAMKOV 1965   Denis Sergeyevich SKUDAYEV 1981   Baranova

impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000     34952/22 27/06/2022 Danil Mikhitarovich SEMENOV 1994 Natalya Andreyevna Baranova

tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 21/07/2021 4,000   57075/21 26/10/2021 Elza Rafilevna MAYER 1995 Baranova

complaints raising issues of police incitement under the substantive and procedural limbs of Article 6 (see, for a detailed description of the applicable principles deriving from the Court’s case-law, Bannikova

André Wampach   Sverre Erik Jebens Deputy Registrar   President ANNEX   No Application No Last name Forename Born Compensation offered (euros)   7120/03 LUNINA   BARKALOVA  

During the encounter with General Baranov he had behaved in a slowed-down manner, as if under the influence of narcotics.

The relevant criteria determining the Court’s examination in this context are set out in the case of Bannikova v. Russia (no. 18757/06, §§   37-65, 4   November 2010).

  Turkey , no. 4601/06, § 67, 24 March 2020; and compare Barahona Guachamin and Others v. Italy (dec.), no. 33295/15, § 67, 4 December 2018).

Russia (nos. 23200/10, 24009/07 and 556/10, 2 October 2012); Bannikova v. Russia (no. 18757/06, 14   October 2010); Vanyan v. Russia (no. 53203/99, 15 December 2005); and Khudobin v.