CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

352 résultats pour « conducteur offset »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0325JUD003142396

Admin. suprême

25 mars 1999

25 mars 1999

Applying that presumption, the authorities considered in the instant case that the applicants had derived an economic benefit from the building of the major road which offset their right to compensation

Page 17 sur 18

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1106JUD002817712

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 2014

6 novembre 2014

Quoting the early case-law of the Court, the Government highlighted that the conduct of the parties had to be examined by the Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1002JUD002249108

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2012

2 octobre 2012

Where such grounds were “relevant” and “sufficient”, the Court must also ascertain whether the competent national authorities displayed “special diligence” in the conduct of the proceedings (see Labita

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0928JUD003144396

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2005

28 septembre 2005

The amount of the pecuniary benefit shall constitute 20% of the value of such property. (3)     In determining the amount to be offset and the pecuniary benefit referred to in subsection (2),

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0626JUD003337607

Admin. suprême

26 juin 2012

26 juin 2012

It prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the victim’s conduct (see, among other authorities, Labita v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0507JUD003686223

Admin. suprême

7 mai 2026

7 mai 2026

The list is also sent to the Attorney General to state his or her opinion, and to the president of the Cyprus Bar Association in consultation with the presidents of the local bar associations.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0403DEC004653811

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2018

3 avril 2018

    Rule 54(1) permits a minister to direct an Employment Tribunal, if he considers it expedient in the interests of national security, to: “(a)     conduct proceedings in private for

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0606JUD007839214

Admin. suprême

6 juin 2019

6 juin 2019

It held that, owing to the applicant’s conduct, the human rights and freedoms of others had been violated.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0122JUD000399103

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2009

22 janvier 2009

    On an unspecified date the tax authorities conducted a VAT audit of the applicant company covering the period from 10 February to 31   December 2000.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0316JUD005384807

Admin. suprême

16 mars 2021

16 mars 2021

The only evidence in the case file was the photo identification conducted by the police, where E.A. had likened the applicant to a certain “Mahir”.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0221DEC004703911

Admin. suprême

21 février 2012

21 février 2012

risks are not unreasonable in the context of the disease or condition to be treated” and whether “[p]roviding the investigational drug for the requested use will not interfere with the initiation, conduct

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0325JUD002238604

Admin. suprême

25 mars 2014

25 mars 2014

Regard must be had in particular to the character of the person involved, his morals, his assets, his links with the State in which he is being prosecuted and his international contacts (see W. v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1102JUD006847901

Admin. suprême

2 novembre 2006

2 novembre 2006

brought eviction proceedings against E.D. in the Bucharest District Court on the ground that she had been occupying a flat, of which they were the owners, without paying them any rent, and that her conduct

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0319JUD002266210

Admin. suprême

19 mars 2020

19 mars 2020

Having regard to the fact that the domestic courts are better placed to interpret and apply the domestic law, the Court does not see any reason to conduct a separate examination of the question of whether

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0622JUD000008718

Admin. suprême

22 juin 2021

22 juin 2021

to relevant local authorities and professional bodies • Failure to provide applicant opportunity to meet allegations during trial • Procedural shortcomings not offset by any effective counter-balancing

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1122DEC003443804

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2007

22 novembre 2007

The balance between the need for openness and the need for court proceedings to be conducted without disturbance could be resolved in various ways. Moreover ...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1103JUD002877005

Admin. suprême

3 novembre 2011

3 novembre 2011

The applicant stated inter alia that she was in contact with her mother and two brothers who were living in Venezuela. 19.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0325JUD001401319

Admin. suprême

25 mars 2021

25 mars 2021

The means test shall be conducted with particular reference , inter alia , to regulations   4 to 8 of the said regulations which shall apply mutatis mutandis. (4) Where the tenant does not meet the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0322JUD003800304

Admin. suprême

22 mars 2011

22 mars 2011

#xa0; sums of money deposited on three deposit accounts ( ժամկետային ավանդ ) opened in 1973-1974 amounting to a total of 19,795.30 roubles as of 1 January 1993, sums of money deposited on three 40% offset

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1016JUD002162313

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2018

16 octobre 2018

Article XII “(1) Everyone shall have the right to freely choose his or her job or profession, and the freedom to conduct a business.

Source officielle