On 15 October 2002 the Constitutional Court found that in the proceedings concerning the validity of the applicant’s dismissal the District Court had violated his right under Article 48 §

    On 29 April 2004 the Constitutional Court found that, in the enforcement proceedings, the District Court had violated the applicant’s right under Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution to a hearing

  Le 9 avril 1997, la Commission (Deuxième Chambre)   a décidé, en application de l'article 48 § 2 b) de son Règlement intérieur, de donner connaissance de la requête au gouvernement mis en cause

    On 8 September 2003 the Constitutional Court found that the District Court had violated the applicants’ right to a hearing “without unjustified delay” (Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution)

    On 28 February 2002 the Constitutional Court ( Ústavný súd ) found that there had been a violation of the applicant’s right under Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution (Constitutional Law no

    Right to legal assistance Article 48 of the Constitution guarantees everyone the right to qualified legal assistance to.

They alleged a violation of the applicants' rights to a hearing without unjustified delay under Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution and to a hearing within a reasonable time ‑ limit under Article

He indicated in his letter that in the proceedings before the Constitutional Court the plaintiffs “alleged a breach of their right under Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution to a hearing without unjustified

    The relevant provisions of Law no. 4174/2013 (“Code of Tax Procedure and other provisions”), as in force at the relevant time, read as follows: Article 48 “2.

At the material time, Article 48 § 2 provided that a temporary residence permit on the grounds of subsidiary protection was valid for one year. 35 .

    Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution provides that an arrested or detained person or a person accused of a criminal offence should have a right to legal representation from the moment of his

    On 30 September 2004 the Constitutional Court found that the District Court had violated the applicant’s right to a hearing “without unjustified delay” (Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution

In this submission, the applicant invoked his right under Article 48 § 2 of the Convention to a hearing without unjustified delay and referred to “all judges of the District Court to whom his matters ha

that an arrested or detained person or a person accused of a criminal offence has a right to legal assistance from the moment of his or her arrest, placement in custody or when charges are brought (Article

    On 11 December 2002 the Constitutional Court found that the District Court had violated the applicant’s right under Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution to a hearing without unjustified delay

He identified the Prešov District Court, the Košice Regional Court, the Prešov Regional Court and the Supreme Court as the authorities responsible for a violation of his rights under Article 48 (2) of

  44   §   2 of the Convention.

ÚS 67/2010) that a third party who joined criminal proceedings with a claim for damages has the right to a hearing “without unjustified delay” (Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution) as such a duly lodged

    L’article 48 § 2 de la même loi 3028/2002 prévoit l’adoption d’un décret présidentiel qui offrirait des subventions et des mobiles économiques à des propriétaires de bâtiments classés comme