Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0602DEC005312820
2 juin 2022
2 juin 2022
41 of the Rules of Court, Having regard to the interim measure indicated to the respondent Government under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, Having deliberated, decides
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;SCREENINGPANEL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-54
21 octobre 1996
21 octobre 1996
34 paras. 1 (a), 3 and 4 of Rules of Court B, 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;SCREENINGPANEL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-58
14 mars 1996
14 mars 1996
34 paras. 1 (a), 3 and 4 of Rules of Court B, 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;SCREENINGPANEL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-17
13 septembre 1995
13 septembre 1995
26 of Rules of Court B (2), _______________ Notes by the Registrar 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;SCREENINGPANEL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-178
6 octobre 1998
6 octobre 1998
34 §§ 1 (a), 3 and 4 of Rules of Court B, 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;SCREENINGPANEL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-189
30 octobre 1998
30 octobre 1998
34 §§ 1 (a), 3 and 4 of Rules of Court B, 1.
Source officielleciv3
61372102cd580146773f0386
25 octobre 1989
25 octobre 1989
LA COUR DE CASSATION, TROISIEME CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par la société anonyme RUFA, dont le siège social est à Caen (Calvados), ..., en cassation d'un arrêt
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;SCREENINGPANEL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-30
13 septembre 1995
13 septembre 1995
26 of Rules of Court B (2), _______________ Notes by the Registrar 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0207DEC001786509
7 février 2012
7 février 2012
measure has been complied with, Having regard to the decision to grant priority to the above application under Rule 41 of the Rules of Court, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;SCREENINGPANEL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-95
16 mai 1997
16 mai 1997
34 paras. 1 (a), 3 and 4 of Rules of Court B, 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;SCREENINGPANEL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-182
6 octobre 1998
6 octobre 1998
State to pay him just satisfaction in compensation for the damage he had allegedly sustained; Having regard to Article 48 of the Convention and Rule 34 §§ 1 (a), 3 and 4 of Rules of Court B, 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1623
10 mars 2009
10 mars 2009
However, applying the rule established in Duke of Brunswick v.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1214DEC000168207
14 décembre 2010
14 décembre 2010
39 of the Rules of Court, Having regard to the decision to grant priority to the above application under Rule 41 of the Rules of Court, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant,
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1208DEC004257320
8 décembre 2022
8 décembre 2022
39 of the Rules of Court, Having regard to the decision to grant the applicants anonymity, in accordance with Rule 47 § 4 of the Rules of the Court, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-55436
11 avril 1986
11 avril 1986
The new rules contain a saving for section 1.5 of the Immigration Act 1971 which requires the Immigration Rules to preserve the position of wives of Commonwealth citizens who were settled in the
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1128DEC002293417
28 novembre 2017
28 novembre 2017
In view of the above, it is appropriate to discontinue the application of Rule 39 of the Rules of Court and to strike the case out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0204DEC000556020
4 février 2021
4 février 2021
On 27 January 2020 the Court indicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”) under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court that the applicant’s extradition should be halted.
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-127580
26 septembre 2013
26 septembre 2013
general measures to prevent abductions and illegal transfers from the Russian territory of persons in whose respect extradition requests were filed and the Court has indicated an interim measure under Rule
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0422JUD004375006
22 avril 2014
22 avril 2014
They referred to the European Prison Rules of the Council of Europe, citing in particular Rule 38.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-632773-638227
10 octobre 2002
10 octobre 2002
They asked the Court to apply Rule 39 of the Rules of Court to prevent extradition.
Source officiellePage 17 sur 2215