La High Court rechercha s’il y avait eu un risque réel que le parti pris ait entraîné une injustice, et conclut que tel n’était pas le cas.

On 10 March 2004 the Higher Commercial Court upheld the lower courts’ decisions. The applicant company did not appeal to the Supreme Court. 2.

TRIBUNAL DE COMMERCE D'ANTIBES ORDONNANCE DU QUATORZE AVRIL DEUX MILLE VINGT-CINQ Numéro d'inscription au répertoire général : 2024R1834 * Demandeur(s): La société SCI HIGH STREET RETAIL 1 [Adresse 1

domicilié [Adresse 1], a formé le pourvoi n° Y 22-10.827 contre l'arrêt rendu le 10 mars 2021 par la cour d'appel de Paris (pôle 6, chambre 8), dans le litige l'opposant : 1°/ à la société Uniprotect High

#Искане за преюдициално заключение: High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division - Обединеното кралство.#Дело 22/81.

#Demande de décision préjudicielle: High Court of Justiciary (Scotland) - Royaume-Uni.

. # Mannesmann AG and others v High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community. # Case 2-59 R - Joined cases 4-59 to 13-59.

#Council and High Authority.#Procedure for the amendment of the Treaty pursuant to the third and fourth paragraphs of Article 95 of the ECSC Treaty.#Opinion 1/60.

. # Eelotsusetaotlus: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Crown Office) - Ühendkuningriik. # Kuues käibemaksu direktiiv. # Kohtuasi C-235/00.

. # Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale: High Court - Irlanda. # Pesca - Equipaggi dei pescherecci. # Causa 223/86.

#Prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą: High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division - Jungtinė Karalystė.#Byla 162/86.

. # Dublinin High Courtin esittämä ennakkoratkaisupyyntö. # Työntekijöiden vapaa liikkuvuus - Vastaanottajamaan virallisen kielen taito. # Asia C-379/87.

#Demande de décision préjudicielle: High Court of justice, Queen's Bench Division - Royaume-Uni.#Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée - Sixième directive - Base d'imposition.#Affaire C-126/88.

The applicant had not requested a fresh examination of the evidence by the High Court. 19.

The indictment was amended and the case file transmitted to the High State Prosecutor ( Viši državni tužilac ) and the High Court in Podgorica.

He was confined to his patient room there for over eight months by a heavy, 80   cm high, bookcase being placed in front of the door, with an alarm, in case he removed the bookcase.

He was confined to his patient room there for over eight months by a heavy, 80   cm high, bookcase being placed in front of the door, with an alarm, in case he removed the bookcase.

On 28 July 2006 the Higher Administrative Court left the applicant’s appeal on points of law without examination.