the circumstances of the case, with reference to the criteria of the complexity of the case and the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see, amongst many other authorities, Mikhail Grishin

It   further held that it was “prepared to accept that in principle the resources of medical facilities within the penitentiary system are limited compared to those of civil[ian] clinics” (see Grishin

Although there was no allegation of overcrowding beyond the design capacity or of a shortage of sleeping places (see, by contrast, Grishin v. Russia , no.

It has further held that it is “prepared to accept that, in principle, the resources of medical facilities within the [prison] system are limited compared to those of civil clinics” (see Grishin v.

It must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention (see Grishin v. Russia , no. 30983/02, § 83, 15   November 2007). 49.

It must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention (see Grishin v. Russia , no. 30983/02, § 83, 15   November 2007). 48.

This complaint must therefore be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention (see Grishin v. Russia , no. 30983/02, § 83, 15 November 2007). 41.

It further held that it was “prepared to accept that in principle the resources of medical facilities within the penitentiary system are limited compared to those of civil[ian] clinics” (see Grishin v.

It has further held that it is prepared to accept that, in principle, the resources of medical facilities within the prison system are limited compared with those of civilian clinics (see Grishin v.

It must therefore be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention (see Grishin v.   Russia , no.   30983/02, § 83, 15   November 2007). 69.

It further held that it was “prepared to accept that in principle the resources of medical facilities within the penitentiary system are limited compared to those of civil[ian] clinics” (see Grishin v.

It has further held that it is “prepared to accept that, in principle, the resources of medical facilities within the [prison] system are limited compared to those of civilian clinics” (see   Grishin

The Court therefore considers that the domestic courts’ reliance on the above reasons was not justified (for similar reasoning, see Mikhail Grishin v. Russia , no. 14807/08, § 144, 24 July 2012).

In the case of Grishin v. Russia (no.

It has further held that it is “prepared to accept that, in principle, the resources of medical facilities within the [prison] system are limited compared to those of civil clinics” (see Grishin v.

suffisamment décrit et évalué les incidences du projet sur l’habitat des prairies mésophiles de fauche ainsi que sur onze espèces, le lapin de garenne, l’alouette lulu, l’agrion de mercure, le gomphe de graslin