He wished to recover the bank's debt from the ARKO, because the ARKO had unlawfully frozen the recovery of debts from the bank.

(Val-d'Oise), et actuellement ...), 2°/ Mme Marie-Thérèse Y..., épouse divorcée X..., demeurant ci-devant lieudit "La Bécassière" à La Teste (Gironde), et actuellement ...

COMPLAINTS The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention that the proceedings had been unfair because the courts had ruled against him.

On 3 January 2001 the judgment became binding, but was not immediately enforced because at that time the Foundation lacked funds.

The applicant alleged under Article 6 of the Convention that his right of access to court was breached because he could not have his challenge against the Romanian Parliament’s decision of 16 October 2012

His request was dismissed because at the time of filing his request, he was 61   years old and had 41 years of work experience and had fulfilled the requirements for the so-called old age pension

Retenu à l'audience de la chambre du conseil du 29/04/2026 où siégeaient : Mme Béatrix Peret, présidente, M. Olivier Dubois, juge, M.

l'arrêté du 18 juillet 2002 du ministre de l'écologie et du développement durable relatif aux dates d'ouverture de la chasse aux oiseaux limicoles en tant qu'il fixe une date trop précoce pour la bécassine

A QUI IL AVAIT ETE VENDU PAR BEATRIX X...

ou transferts de fonds ; qu'il évalue à 3 millions de francs environ les sommes qui ont ainsi été utilisées et qui n'ont pas été remboursées ; qu'il indique que les contrats de prêt signés chez Me Berard

The applicant’s detention with a view to removal was extended by two months because of her refusal to comply with the expulsion measure.

Jean-Olivier X... et le condamne à payer à la SCP Laugier et Caston, avocat de Mme Marie-Béatrix X..., la somme de 3 000 euros ; Ainsi fait et jugé par la Cour de cassation, première chambre civile,

    The applicant further complains that she was deprived of her right to peaceful possession of her property because her house was destroyed and because she is not able to obtain compensation

On 2 April 2001, the prosecution closed the case because of the applicant’s death.

On bailiffs' requests, in 2002–07 courts several times adjourned the enforcement because the applicant had refused the command's offers, and because no other flats were available. B.

  Article 8 because he was not allowed to help his sick sister.   Article 10 because he was not allowed to listen to radio programmes of his choice in prison.

On 13 December 2023 the prosecutor’s office closed the investigation against the applicant because of lack of evidence that he committed the offences.

Whereas the Amsterdam Regional Court acquitted the applicant of complicity in manslaughter because there was no conclusive technical evidence available and it therefore mainly came down to witness X’s