Meanwhile, on 10 January 2006, the Constitutional Court found that the District Court had violated the applicant’s right under Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution to a hearing without unjustified

des observations écrites sur la recevabilité et le bien-fondé de la requête (article 48 (2) (b) du Règlement intérieur) ;         Vu les observations présentées par le Gouvernement

48-1, alinéa 2, de la loi du 29 juillet 1881, c'est seulement quand l'infraction a été commise "envers des personnes considérées individuellement" que l'association plaignante doit justifier avoir reçu

    On 4 May 2006 the Constitutional Court found that the Martin District Court had violated the applicant’s right under Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution to a hearing without unjustified delay

29), the right to respect for home (Article 34) and right to property (Article 48). 2.

Relying on Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution, he contended that the length of the enforcement proceedings against him had been excessive. 14.

    Relevant domestic law and practice Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution states that an arrested person has the right to assistance of a lawyer from the moment of the arrest.

The Constitutional Court thus found several violations of plaintiffs' rights under Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution on account of the excessive length of the civil proceedings and awarded compensation

    Article 48(2) of the Constitution provides, inter alia , that every person has the right to have his or her case tried without unjustified delay. 18.

    On 17 May 2001 the Constitutional Court found, inter alia , that the District Court had violated the applicant's right under Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution to a hearing without unjustified

    On 27 January 2005 the Constitutional Court found that the Trenčín District Court had violated the applicant’s right under Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution to a hearing without unjustified

    On 23 August 2005 the Constitutional Court found that the District Court had violated the applicant’s right under Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution to a hearing without unjustified delay

44 § 2 of the Convention.

  Le 26 février 1997, la Commission (Deuxième Chambre) a décidé, en application de l'article 48 § 2 b) de son Règlement intérieur, de donner connaissance de la requête au gouvernement mis en cause

  44 §   2 of the Convention.

  Le 21 mai 1997, la Commission (Deuxième Chambre) a décidé, en application de l'article 48 § 2 b) de son Règlement intérieur, de donner connaissance de la requête au gouvernement mis en cause, et

46 § 1 (right to judicial protection), 47 § 3 (equality of parties to judicial proceedings) and 48 § 2 (right to comment on the evidence assessed) of the Constitution, as well as Article 6 § 1 (fairness

8 de la Convention européenne de sauvegarde des droits et des libertés fondamentales, a fait l'exacte application de l'article 222-48, alinéa 2, du Code de procédure pénale ; Qu'ainsi, le moyen ne

4 June 2003, respectively, the Constitutional Court declared the complaint admissible and found that the District Court had violated the applicant's right to a hearing “without unjustified delay” (Article