applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table.

conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.

No reply to these letters has been received by the Court.

conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.

conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.

Răduleţu , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 7   December 2022, Having regard to the observations submitted by the

Răduleţu , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 25   July 2016, Having regard to the observations submitted by the

in tort was an effective remedy for grievances similar to those of the applicants, allowing them to have the violation of the Convention acknowledged, either explicitly or in substance, and to receive

Subsequently, in Vlad , cited above, §§   24-32, the Court considered it appropriate to apply an exception to the general principle that the effectiveness of a given remedy was to be assessed with

Subsequently, in Vlad , cited above, §§   24-32, the Court considered it appropriate to apply an exception to the general principle that the effectiveness of a given remedy was to be assessed with

Răduleţu , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 29   January 2021, Having regard to the observations submitted by the

Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the “reasonable time” requirement. 9.

Therefore, she needed somebody to provide care to herself and her two young children.

chamber of the Constitutional Court which decided her case (notably, that Judge L.Đ. had previously acted in this case in the capacity of a judge of the Supreme Court of Cassation) were communicated to

an effective remedy for grievances similar to those of the applicants, allowing them to have the violation of the Convention acknowledged, either explicitly or in substance, and to receive adequate and

The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received.

The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received by the Court.

  Tambur who on 17 March 2025 was granted leave by the Section President to represent the applicant; the decision to give notice of the application to the Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina (“the

conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.