CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1330374-1388069
24 mai 2005
Before the First Hall, the applicant alleged that the Maltese system penalised men and favoured women; during the preceding five years only 3.05% of women had served as jurors as opposed to 96.95%
Page 16 sur 497
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1217DEC000937120
17 décembre 2020
The son did not expressly confirm that he was affected by the violations alleged by the applicant and that he suffered in this regard.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1128DEC001604911
28 novembre 2017
The Government submitted that the applicant was no longer a victim of the alleged violation since the courts had provided redress for the grievance. The applicant disagreed. 11.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0329JUD004576118
29 mars 2022
No investigation was carried out into the applicant’s alleged abduction. THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLEs 3 and 34 OF THE CONVENTION 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0414JUD006069911
14 avril 2022
THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 AND ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No. 1 to the convention 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0425JUD001485821
25 avril 2024
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1202JUD000101114
2 décembre 2021
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 8 of the Convention 17.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0425JUD000676823
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1026JUD003715018
26 octobre 2023
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION 7. The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0828DEC001387605
28 août 2007
18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 13876/05 by Peter
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0114DEC003403315
14 janvier 2025
Alleged violation of Article 13 of the Convention 17.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0309JUD001155709
9 mars 2023
That complaint reflected the alleged breach that has been raised before the Court (see Radomilja and Others v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0113JUD006013016
13 janvier 2022
THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 4 of PROTOCOL nO. 7 TO THE CONVENTION 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0520JUD005359412
20 mai 2021
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1207JUD004093006
7 décembre 2021
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLEs 3 AND 13 OF THE CONVENTION 49.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0606JUD003823797
6 juin 2002
litre or 0.4 milligrams per litre respectively. 16.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68325-68793
23 mai 2000
FRANCE In a judgment [1] delivered at Strasbourg on 23 May 2000 in the case of Van Pelt v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1021DEC002132413
21 octobre 2021
The applicant’s complaints under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) of the Convention concerning the alleged lack of the fairness of criminal proceedings against him and the alleged lack of effective legal assistance
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0711DEC003187020
11 juillet 2023
It has been established that the domestic remedy to be used in relation to alleged violations of Article 8 of the Convention on account of alleged flaws in surveillance warrants is a complaint to the Constitutional
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-169059
3 novembre 2016
The applicant, Mr Peter Jarkovský, is a Slovak national who was born in 1963 and lives in Prešov. The circumstances of the case 2.