CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

1 875 571 résultats pour « Party »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0531DEC000696502

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2005

31 mai 2005

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3845

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2005

31 mai 2005

the question of his transfer had not been preceded by any written document, which meant that his transfer had been based solely on deliberations in which the Vicar of the Parish of Rovaniemi had taken part

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0616DEC000554803

Admin. suprême

16 juin 2005

16 juin 2005

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0623DEC000511703

Admin. suprême

23 juin 2005

23 juin 2005

The Court considers, in the light of the parties' submissions, that this part of the application raises complex issues of law and fact under the Convention, the determination of which should depend on

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0630DEC006680201

Admin. suprême

30 juin 2005

30 juin 2005

The parties' descriptions of this cell differ. According to the applicant, the microclimate in this cell was so poor that he caught skin rash.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0630DEC006694101

Admin. suprême

30 juin 2005

30 juin 2005

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0630DEC004218002

Admin. suprême

30 juin 2005

30 juin 2005

On 13 March 2002 the Beloyarskiy District Court of the Sverdlovsk Region granted the applicants' action in part.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0630DEC002455202

Admin. suprême

30 juin 2005

30 juin 2005

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.   1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0705DEC005433400

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2005

5 juillet 2005

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1021DEC004374898

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2004

21 octobre 2004

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4180

Admin. suprême

26 octobre 2004

26 octobre 2004

Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1028DEC001814702

Admin. suprême

28 octobre 2004

28 octobre 2004

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1109DEC007305301

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 2004

9 novembre 2004

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1116DEC004881799

Admin. suprême

16 novembre 2004

16 novembre 2004

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1118DEC003173496

Admin. suprême

18 novembre 2004

18 novembre 2004

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1123DEC000543302

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2004

23 novembre 2004

s action in this part.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1123DEC000514002

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2004

23 novembre 2004

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4148

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2004

30 novembre 2004

The union was allowed to submit observations, but was not formally a party to the proceedings before the Competition Authority.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1130DEC005350799

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2004

30 novembre 2004

The Competition Authority heard evidence from the Association, T. and four other member companies, as parties to the case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1202DEC005595500

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 2004

2 décembre 2004

The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle

Page 16 sur 93779

← PrécédentSuivant →