CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

346 résultats pour « Jechoux »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CA

Chambre Prud'homale

694a5c4a75782d5f06558f7d

Appel

18 décembre 2025

18 décembre 2025

décision attaquée en date du 02 Février 2022, enregistrée sous le n° F/2000679 ARRÊT DU 18 Décembre 2025 APPELANT : Monsieur [O] [H] [Adresse 1] [Localité 3] représenté par Maître Marine JEGOU

Page 16 sur 18

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1007DEC003210696

Admin. suprême

7 octobre 1999

7 octobre 1999

Section 1 of Act No. 58/1969 on Liability for Damage Caused by a State Organ’s Decision or by an Erroneous Official Act of 1969 ( Zákon o zodpovednosti za škodu spôsobenú rozhodnutím orgánu štátu alebo jeho

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0913DEC003210696

Admin. suprême

13 septembre 2001

13 septembre 2001

/1969 on the liability of the State for damage caused by a State organ’s decision or by its erroneous official action ( Zákon o   zodpovednosti za škodu spôsobenú rozhodnutím orgánu štátu alebo jeho

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0903DEC001992310

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 2013

3 septembre 2013

The Appeal Court stated: “[27]     In the first place it is important to notice that Scots law is particularly jealous to protect a person who has, in the domestic sense, been charged with a

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1969:0204DEC000324567

Admin. suprême

4 février 1969

4 février 1969

Further inquiries showed that she was, and has reason to be, jealous on account of her husband's relations with other women.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0131JUD002443094

Admin. suprême

31 janvier 2002

31 janvier 2002

satisfies Article 5 § 4, on condition that the procedure followed has a judicial character and gives to the individual concerned guarantees appropriate to the kind of deprivation of liberty in question ( Jecius

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0523JUD006180819

Admin. suprême

23 mai 2023

23 mai 2023

5 § 4, on condition that the procedure followed has a judicial character and affords the individual concerned guarantees that are appropriate to the kind of deprivation of liberty in question (see Jecius

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1203JUD002893521

Admin. suprême

3 décembre 2024

3 décembre 2024

    Around the same time as their relationship ended, V.C.A. got into an argument with one of the applicant’s male friends because V.C.A had become jealous of that friend.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0708JUD003305617

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2021

8 juillet 2021

The police officer then questioned L.M., who acknowledged that he was a jealous person and had indeed made death threats against M.T. multiple times.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0703DEC003813410

Admin. suprême

3 juillet 2018

3 juillet 2018

He had refused, claiming that his girlfriend was jealous. 27.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0210JUD007397516

Admin. suprême

10 février 2022

10 février 2022

He had become particularly jealous after their separation because he had started seeing her date other men.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0629DEC005645100

Admin. suprême

29 juin 2004

29 juin 2004

/1969 on the liability of the State for damage caused by a State organ’s decision or by its erroneous official action ( Zákon o   zodpovednosti za škodu spôsobenú rozhodnutím orgánu štátu alebo jeho

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0107JUD004337798

Admin. suprême

7 janvier 2003

7 janvier 2003

No. 58/1969 on the liability of the State for damage caused by a State organ’s decision or by its erroneous official action ( Zákon o zodpovednosti za škodu spôsobenú rozhodnutím orgánu štátu alebo jeho

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:0710DEC001087184

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 1986

10 juillet 1986

and circulated         them among South African exiles to 'prove' Stan was making         false claims against me because he was jealous

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0424JUD005769310

Admin. suprême

24 avril 2012

24 avril 2012

According to the applicant’s criminal complaint, he was jealous and had threatened to kill her and anyone she let into the flat.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1107JUD002138004

Admin. suprême

7 novembre 2013

7 novembre 2013

The applicant had committed the murder because he had been jealous of the relationship between one of the victims and his wife.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1028JUD002345294

Admin. suprême

28 octobre 1998

28 octobre 1998

In his memorandum of 5   May 1988 (see paragraph 15 above) Mr   Perkins stated that he found the statement “disturbing” since it showed clearly that Paget-Lewis was “overpoweringly jealous” of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0515DEC001342012

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2012

15 mai 2012

R.’s former wife had described R. as reliable and affectionate in a relationship, and said that he had never been violent, aggressive, disrespectful, controlling or jealous.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0904JUD003055622

Admin. suprême

4 septembre 2025

4 septembre 2025

Common Part -           ensure fidelity on both sides (do not flirt, do not try to make the other jealous, do not frequent prostitutes) -    

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0112JUD002611102

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 2006

12 janvier 2006

    Finally, as jealousy was a recurring theme in life, the Maltese legislator had protected wives and their children from the antics of jealous husbands or fathers.

Source officielle