The applicants applied for judicial review. The Supreme Administrative Court allowed their request for the face value of the shares to be taken into account rather than their book value.

The District Court reviewed the applicants’ claims regarding their title to the plots of land and concluded that since the expiry of the lease in 2005 the applicants had occupied and used the plots of

    The Court notes that this complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention.

In this regard, the applicant cannot be regarded as a victim of the alleged infringement.

Article 35 of the Convention obliges those seeking to bring their case against the State before the Court to first use the remedies provided by the national legal system, thus dispensing States from answering

In the case of Isayev v.

He was represented before the Court by Ms L. V. Opryshko, a lawyer practising in Kyiv. The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs V.

their applications to the Court.

’ responsibility for the uncertainty regarding the status of their houses had increased with the passage of time.

In addition, the sale of the flats to individuals cast doubt on their continued use for tourist-hotel purposes and this change of purpose also placed the site development in breach of the law.

He was represented before the Court by Mr K.H. Christoph, a lawyer practising in Berlin. The German Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs A.

Since the couple's separation in 2007 the children have been living with their mother.

The Czech Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr V.A. Schorm, from the Ministry of Justice. A.

The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Yuriy Zaytsev. 1.

The German Government (“the Government”) are represented by their Deputy Agent, Mr   H.   J.   Behrens, Ministerialrat, of the Federal Ministry of Justice.

I accept the proposal and waive any further claims against Bulgaria in respect of the facts giving rise to this application. I declare that this constitutes a final resolution of the case.”

In the case of Isayev v.

the issue raised by this complaint.

The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs Valeria Lutkovska.