La société Griffine est titulaire de la marque GRIFFLIN déposée le 25 décembre 2009 à l'INPI.

Représentée par la SELARL de GRESLAN, avocat au barreau de NOUMEA INTIMÉS M. Eugène Vincent X... né le 22 Octobre 1958 à BOURAIL (98870) demeurant... Mme Marielle Z... épouse X...

aux droits de TRENWICK INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, prise en la personne de son représentant légal en exercice Siège social : 3 rue de Sébastopol-BP. 8069-98807 NOUMEA CEDEX Représentée par la SELARL de GRESLAN

NOUMEA CEDEX représentée par la SELARL JURISCAL INTIMÉS LA SOCIETE BALLANDE, SAS prise en la personne de son représentant légal 21-23 rue de l'Alma-98800 NOUMEA représentée par la SELARL de GRESLAN

It further held that it was “prepared to accept that in principle the resources of medical facilities within the [penal] system are limited compared to those of civil[ian] clinics” (see Grishin v.

Attendu qu'il résulte de l'arrêt attaqué que, contrairement à ce qui est allégué, André X... a été renvoyé devant le tribunal correctionnel pour n'avoir pas provoqué la désignation d'un commissaire au

adéquats, que son état de santé s’est détérioré au-delà de l’évolution normale de ses pathologies ou qu’il a souffert outre mesure du fait d’une assistance médicale insuffisante (voir, mutatis mutandis , Grishin

administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO   5,000   50818/21 24/09/2021 Dmitriy Eduardovich GRISHIN

Petersburg 22/03 Grigoryevskikh 27/08/2001 to 12/07/2002 IZ-36/2 in Borisoglebsk 30983/02 Grishin 12/05/2001 to 16/04/2002 IZ-24/1in Krasnoyarsk 36941/02 Gubkin 15/06/1998 to 25/04/2005 IZ-61/1 in Rostov-on-Don

It further held that it was “prepared to accept that in principle the resources of medical facilities within the [penal] system are limited compared to those of civil[ian] clinics” (see Grishin v.

  50818/21 24/09/2021 Dmitriy Eduardovich GRISHIN 1993 Vladislav Vladimirovich Kosnyrev Syktyvkar Rally "Free Navalnyy"   Syktyvkar 31/03/2021 article 20.2 §   5 of CAO fine of RUB 12,000

2019 - 20/07/2019,   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities     11549/20 25/02/2020 Igor Nikolayevich GRISHIN

It has further held that it is “prepared to accept that, in principle, the resources of medical facilities within the [prison] system are limited compared to those of civil clinics” (see   Grishin

Russia , no. 591/07, §§ 52-53, 27 June 2013; and Grishin v. Russia , no. 30983/02, § 74, 15 November 2007).

It has therefore been lodged out of time and must be rejected in accordance with Article   35   §§   1 and   4 of the Convention (see Grishin v.

  72277/01, §   46, 12 October 2006, and Grishin v. Russia , no.   30983/02, §   83, 15   November 2007). 36.

It has further held that it is “prepared to accept that, in principle, the resources of medical facilities within the penitentiary system are limited compared to those of civil clinics” (see Grishin v.

In the case of Grishin v.

went further, holding that it was “prepared to accept that in principle the resources of medical facilities within the penitentiary system are limited compared to those of civil[ian] clinics” (see Grishin