CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
Chambre 1-1
6809c9451f1ed98b447f43f8
23 avril 2025
ARRÊT Contradictoire, Prononcé par mise à disposition au greffe le 23 Avril 2025, Signé par Madame Elisabeth TOULOUSE, Présidente de chambre et Mme Anastasia LAPIERRE, greffier auquel la minute
Page 16 sur 70
6a17d92dcdc6046d47319d62
27 mai 2026
BERLINER, avocat au barreau de NICE, avocat plaidant *-*-*-*-* COMPOSITION DE LA COUR L'affaire a été débattue le 24 Mars 2026 en audience publique devant la cour composée de : Madame Elisabeth
Cour d'Appel
6253cc97bd3db21cbdd909d3
11 septembre 2013
Ils ajoutent que la sommation de restituer les clés qu'ils ont délivrée, a fait perdre à cette possession, son caractère paisible et public.
5ème chambre (formation à 3)
DCA_23BX01283_20240130
30 janvier 2024
Délibéré après l'audience du 9 janvier 2024 à laquelle siégeaient : Mme Elisabeth Jayat, présidente, M.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1016DEC002898195
16 octobre 1996
#xa0; Application No. 28981/95 by Anthony and Elizabeth
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1104DEC002034709
4 novembre 2014
It is clear that the applicants themselves were responsible for the delay of one year and a half in enforcing the judgments in their favour.
Pôle 5 - Chambre 3
5fca62adcd9db94aae9c7a23
4 novembre 2020
Le liquidateur judiciaire a alors décidé de ne pas poursuivre le contrat de location gérance et a remis les clefs des locaux à Maître [Z]-[U] ès qualités.
Pôle 3 - Chambre 1
6162bb47f32b7c38854c300d
28 novembre 2012
[W] [C] a remis les clefs du bien à Me [X] ; Que, s'agissant de la période comprise entre le [Date décès 7] 1994, date du décès de [A] [O], et le 13 août 2002, date du départ de M.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0323DEC003932798
23 mars 1999
It further found that the summons were sufficiently clear for the applicant to understand what was held against him and against what he should defend himself.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0209DEC002770008
9 février 2010
27700/08 by Peter HOLLAND against Sweden The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 9 February 2010 as a Chamber composed of: Josep Casadevall, President, Elisabet
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0219JUD000961905
19 février 2013
Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of: Elisabeth Steiner, President, Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2318353-2495906
8 avril 2008
Judgment was given by a Chamber of seven judges, composed as follows: Josep Casadevall (Andorran), President , Elisabet Fura-Sandström (Swedish), Rıza Türmen (Turkish), Corneliu Bîrsan (Romanian
ECLI:CEDH:003-3146845-3492773
27 mai 2010
Judgment was given by a Chamber of seven judges, composed as follows: Josep Casadevall (Andorra), President , Elisabet Fura (Sweden), Corneliu Bîrsan (Romania), Boštjan M.
ECLI:CEDH:003-3047690-3366636
2 mars 2010
Judgment was given by a Chamber of seven judges, composed as follows: Josep Casadevall (Andorra), President , Elisabet Fura (Sweden), Corneliu Bîrsan (Romania), Alvina Gyulumyan (Armenia)
ECLI:CEDH:003-2908986-3195331
27 octobre 2009
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0417DEC001642904
17 avril 2012
Zupančič, President, Elisabet Fura, Ann Power-Forde, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 15 April 2004, Having
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0602DEC004297405
2 juin 2009
PATIROM S.A. against Romania The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 2 June 2009 as a Chamber composed of: Josep Casadevall, President, Elisabet Fura-Sandström,
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1051981-1088874
20 juillet 2004
composed as follows: Nicolas Bratza (British), President , Matti Pellonpää (Finnish), Viera Strážnická (Slovakian), Josep Casadevall (Andorran), Rait Maruste (Estonian), Lech Garlicki (Polish), Elisabet
PRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1394308-1455831
6 juillet 2005
Not only were the regulations not published, they contained no clear safeguards to prevent the arbitrary deprivation of life.
ECLI:CEDH:003-1040422-1076658
29 juin 2004
There was a legal basis for that interference in Turkish law, as the case-law of the Constitutional Court made it clear that authorising students to “cover the neck and hair with a veil or headscarf