CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

20 088 résultats pour « Conerardy »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9686

Admin. suprême

30 juin 1993

30 juin 1993

member and would otherwise run risk of losing licence   - form of compulsion which struck at very substance of the Article 11 right and itself amounted to interference - impugned compulsion was contrary

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-229560

Admin. suprême

16 novembre 2023

16 novembre 2023

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68108-68576

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2000

11 janvier 2000

  Complaint   The applicant complains of inhuman and degrading treatment contrary to Article 3 of the t European Convention on Human Rights and of the excessive length of the proceedings, contrary

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-216332

Admin. suprême

15 février 2022

15 février 2022

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private and/or family life, contrary to Article   8 of the Convention, owing to the restrictions (in terms of duration

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-204795

Admin. suprême

1 septembre 2020

1 septembre 2020

    Has there been a violation of the applicant community’s freedom of religion, contrary to Article 9 of the Convention?   4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-181329

Admin. suprême

7 février 2018

7 février 2018

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions, contrary to the requirements of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1?   3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-231935

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2024

7 mars 2024

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her family life, contrary to Article   8 of the Convention (see Petrov and X v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-233925

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2024

3 mai 2024

    Did the circumstances and manner of the treatment by the detention facility authorities of the applicant’s ailments amount to inhuman treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-247571

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2025

10 novembre 2025

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s rights to freedom of expression and to freedom of peaceful assembly contrary to Articles   10 and   11 of the Convention (see Ukraine

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68069-68537

Admin. suprême

18 mai 1999

18 mai 1999

homosexuality and their subsequent discharges violated their right to respect for their private lives, protected by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and that they were discriminatory, contrary

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-247812

Admin. suprême

25 novembre 2025

25 novembre 2025

She submits that the body search was unnecessary, arbitrary, disproportionate and humiliating, contrary to the prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment and her right to respect for her private life

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-238484

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2024

13 novembre 2024

    Has the applicant suffered discrimination on account of her sex and age, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article   8 of the Convention and/or Article

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-224845

Admin. suprême

27 avril 2023

27 avril 2023

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of movement, contrary to Article   2 of Protocol No.   4 to the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-216412

Admin. suprême

21 février 2022

21 février 2022

Six months later the applicant lodged a new request for a transfer of J.’s main residence and for sole custody arguing that the mother acted in a manner contrary to J.’s best interest.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-141188

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2014

22 janvier 2014

MTE was of the view that this practice was unethical, misled consumers and was contrary to the Code of Content Providing on Internet.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-209983

Admin. suprême

16 avril 2021

16 avril 2021

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her private life contrary to Article   8 of the Convention (see, among others, Pretty v. the United Kingdom , no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-171430

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 2017

24 janvier 2017

final decisions to remove (extradite or deport) the applicants to Uzbekistan, despite their consistent claims that in the event of their removal to Uzbekistan they would face a real risk of treatment contrary

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-112104

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2012

19 juin 2012

    If extradited, would the applicant be at real risk of a flagrant denial of justice, contrary to Article 6 of the Convention, arising, in particular, from the use of evidence obtained by treatment

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1025

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2010

30 mars 2010

On the contrary, her representatives had made arrangements for her to be present in the building.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-244953

Admin. suprême

26 août 2025

26 août 2025

This judgment was reversed on appeal by a decision of 1 October 2024 which annulled Parliament’s decision, the latter having been considered unlawful, contrary to law and lacking reasons.

Source officielle

Page 16 sur 1005

← PrécédentSuivant →

Annonces BODACC3 résultats

Journal officiel
Procédures collectives

CONERARDY, Pierre, Alain, Claude

TRIBUNAL DE GRANDE INSTANCE DE METZ

Jugement de clôture pour insuffisance d'actif — Jugement de clôture pour insuffisance d'actif ; mandataire liquidateur : Maître GANGLOFF (Christine), 36, rue des Jardins, 57050 Le Ban-Saint-Martin

23/02/2012

Voir →

Procédures collectives

CONERARDY, Pierre, Alain

TRIBUNAL DE GRANDE INSTANCE DE METZ

Dépôt de l'état des créances Loi de 1985 — Avis de dépôt de l'état des créances, dépôt de l'état des créances au Tribunal de Grande Instance de Metz où les réclamations seront recevables dans un délai de quinze jours à compter de la présente publication

04/08/2008

Voir →

Procédures collectives

CONERARDY, Pierre, Alain, Claude

TRIBUNAL DE GRANDE INSTANCE DE METZ

Jugement d'ouverture de liquidation judiciaire — Jugement prononçant la liquidation judiciaire ; insolvabilité notoire fixée au 24 octobre 2005 ; mandataire judiciaire à la liquidation : La SELARL ETUDE GANGLOFF & NARDI prise en la personne de Maître GANGLOFF (Christine), 36 rue des Jardins 57050 Le Ban-Saint-Martin

22/05/2008

Voir →