La Cour rappelle que l’article 26 de la Convention (art. 26) n’exige l’épuisement que des recours accessibles, adéquats et relatifs aux violations incriminées (arrêts Ciulla c.

  D.H., arrêt du 6 novembre 1980, Série A n° 39) et Ciulla (Cour Eur.

Court H.R., Ciulla judgment of 22 February 1989, Series A no. 148, p. 15, para. 31; Brozicek judgment of 19 December 1989, Series A no. 167, pp. 16-17, para. 34).

Judgments and Decisions 1998 ‑ VII) and that sub-paragraph (c) of Article 5 § 1 must be read in conjunction both with sub-paragraph (a) and with paragraph 3, which forms a whole with it (see Ciulla

Ireland (no. 3) , 1   July 1961, § 14, Series A no. 3; Ciulla v.

Turkey , judgment of 26 November 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VII, p. 2626, § 60, and Ciulla v. Italy , judgment of 22 February 1989, Series A no. 148, pp. 18-19, § 44). 53.

Court H.R., Ciulla judgment of 22 February 1989, Series A no. 148, p. 15, para. 31; Brozicek judgment of 19 December 1989, Series A no. 167, pp. 16-17, para. 34).

Court H.R., Ciulla judgment of 22 February 1989, Series A no. 148, p. 15, para. 31; Brozicek judgment of 19 December 1989, Series A no. 167, pp. 16-17, para. 34).

Three strands in particular may be identified as running through the Court’s case-law: the exhaustive nature of the exceptions, which must be interpreted strictly (see Ciulla v.

    Article 5 § 1 (c) of the Convention must be read in conjunction with Article 5 § 3 which forms a whole with it (see Ciulla v.

Realitatea e că azi, [D.H.] şi distributorul său 'Skoda' sunt bine mersi, prosperă şi vând Cancelariei de Stat loturi uriaşe de automobile de lux, spre ciuda concurenţilor . ”) 16.

In this connection, the effective enjoyment of the right to compensation guaranteed by Article 5 § 5 must be ensured with a sufficient degree of certainty (see Ciulla v.

The effective enjoyment of the right to compensation guaranteed by Article 5 § 5 must be ensured with a sufficient degree of certainty (see Ciulla v.

The obligation must be of a specific and concrete nature (see Ciulla v.   Italy , 22   February 1989, § 36, Series A no. 148). 41.

Court H.R., Ciulla judgment of 22 February 1989, Series A no. 148, p. 15, para. 31; Brozicek judgment of 19 December 1989, Series A no. 167, pp. 16-17, para. 34).

CECCHINI 1951 Carmine CECERE 1962 Pasquale CELESTINO 1964 Salvatore CERULLO 1960 Evaldo CHIACCHIERONI 1965 Maurizio CHIARIOTTI 1954 Gaetano CHINNICI 1960 Gennaro CIOCE 1958 Omere CIOLI 1953 Giuseppe CIUFFI

order, considering that the Court has previously held that the phrase “obligation prescribed by law” denotes an obligation of a specific and concrete nature already incumbent on the person concerned ( Ciulla

Belgium; 22.5.1984, De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink v. the Netherlands; 29.11.1988, Brogan and Others v. the United Kingdom; 22.2.1989, Ciulla v.

2018 16/01/2019   52782/12 27/07/2012 (22 requérants) Maria Rosaria SANTANIELLO 04/03/1955 Alessandro MUSCOLINO 01/02/1931 Angela VULLO 13/03/1956 Maria Antonina VETRO 21/03/1953 Rosaria IACONO CIULLA