Non-pecuniary damage Costs and expenses Date of payment ACAR Mehmet Emin 1901/02 10/10/06 10/01/07 17 455 € - 1 000 € 10/04/07 ACIKGOZ 76855/01 24/10/06 24/01/07 2   754 € - 1   000 € 20/04/07 AKKAN

Türkiye 13/09/2022 Seher ÖZBALTA YILDIRIM 1989 Kayseri Turkish Zehra KARAKULAK BOZDAĞ 188. 45400/22 Akhan v. Türkiye 16/09/2022 Mustafa AKHAN 1995 Sakarya Turkish Emrullah POLAT 189. 45544/22 Ateş v.

/10/04 02/02/05 1 932 €   300 € 26/04/05 YURTKURAN et autres 50730/99 07/10/04 02/02/05 269 579 €   500 € 27/04/05 ÇIFTÇI 50732/99 07/10/04 02/02/05 7 888 €   300 € 02/05/05 GÜRKAN et AKTAN

  Turkey , no. 25754/94, § 23, judgment of 26   March 2002, Akman v. Turkey (striking out), no. 37453/97, §§ 30-31, ECHR 2001 ‑ VI, and Meriakri v.

category and offering a sufficient basis for finding that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention does not require the Court to continue its examination of the case (see, by contrast, Akman

  11602/02, 26   June   2007; and Akman v.   Turkey (striking out), no.   37453/97, §   31, ECHR 2001 ‑ VI).

conclusion sur la question de savoir quand et comment les blessures des requérants ont pu se produire (voir, par exemple, pour un examen sur la nécessité et la proportionnalité du recours à la force, Ahmet Akman

  Turkey , no. 25754/94, § 23, judgment of 26   March   2002, Akman v. Turkey (striking out), no. 37453/97, §§ 30 ‑ 31, ECHR 2001 ‑ VI, and Meriakri v.

category and offering a sufficient basis for finding that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention does not require the Court to continue its examination of the case (see, by contrast, Akman

submit a statement offering a sufficient basis for finding that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention does not require the Court to continue its examination of the case (see, by contrast, Akman

Turquie (n° 76855/01) Akkan et Erkızılkaya c. Turquie (n° 48055/99) Kürkçü et autres c. Turquie (n° 7142/02) Terece c. Turquie (n° 41054/98) Üstücan et autres c.

Turquie (n° 2) (n o 30465/02), arrêt du 12 décembre 2006 Akkan et Erkizilkaya c. Turquie (n o 48055/99), arrêt du 24 octobre 2006 Anter et autres c.

février 2017, en libre accès sur le site internet de la CNDA, et confirmé par une étude de mai 2023 de la CNDA, que le taux de prévalence de l'excision est de moins de 3% chez le groupe ethnique des Akans

and sufficient reasons for detention Restriction of access to the investigation file Lack of hearing during the detention review Lack/Difficulties of legal assistance/other facilities   53473/22 Aktan

    Requête n o : 40819/02 Requérants   : héritiers de Cevat Çetinkaya Muammer Çetinkaya, Irfan Çetinkaya, Emine Nihal Çetinkaya et Zuhal Aktan Date de naissance   : 1931, 1957, 1963

  Ahmet Akman v. Turkey (no. 33245/05) The applicant, Ahmet Akman, is a Turkish national who was born 1987 and lives in Istanbul.

Turquie (n o 13101/03)   Violation de l’article 1 du Protocole n° 1 Les huit requérants, Tuncay Uysal, Nazım Uysal, Hasan Uysal, İsmail Uysal, Mehmet Uysal, Emine Taşkın, Nermin Aklan et Gülten Eğe

  Ferdi Çiloğlu, Atilla Aşçı, Akan Şenel, Ertuğrul Bilir et Samüt Karabulut, ainsi que M mes Mehtap Yurtluk, Semra Şahin, Sevinç Hocaoğulları, Sultan Aksu, Zeynep Çelik, Yasemin Varlık et Gülden Aktaş

Türkiye 16/11/2021 Cemal KİBAR 1993 Giresun Turkish Meral ÖZATA ÖZGÜROL 118. 58316/21 Akan v. Türkiye 29/11/2021 Ali AKAN 1974 Karaman Turkish Kübra GÜLAÇTI 119. 58379/21 Türkmen v.