On 18 June 2003 the Constitutional Court found that the Bratislava   V District Court had violated the applicant's right under Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution to a hearing without

In its judgment the Constitutional Court found that the District Court had violated the applicant's right under Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution to a   hearing without unjustified delay.

Article 75. “2.

dans un local situé au rez-de-chaussée et donné à bail à une association religieuse, dont Emmanuel X... est le président ; que celui-ci a été cité devant le tribunal de police pour contravention à l'article

    Article 48 (2) of the Constitution provides, inter alia , that every person has the right to have his or her case tried without unjustified delay. 25.

    Article 48 (2) of the Constitution provides, inter alia , that every person has the right to have his or her case tried without unjustified delay. 33.

de chacune des cautions, encore lui faut-il démontrer qu'après déchéance des intérêts il lui reste dû au total au moins la somme de 100.000 francs ; Considérant qu'en vertu des dispositions de l'article

    The Constitution and the Constitutional Court's practice Article 48(2) of the Constitution provides, inter alia , that every person has the right to have his or her case tried without unjustified

  La demande de la Commission renvoie aux articles 44 et 48 (art. 44, art. 48) ainsi qu'à la déclaration italienne de reconnaissance de la juridiction obligatoire de la Cour (article 46) (art. 46)

La requête a été enregistrée le 24 janvier 1996 sous le numéro de dossier 29958/96 et le 24 février 1997, la Commission européenne des droits de l’Homme a décidé, en application de l’ancien article 48

44 § 2 de la Convention.

    On 20 April 2005 the Constitutional Court found that the District Court had violated the applicant's right under Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution to a hearing without unjustified delay.

    On 18 August 2004 the Constitutional Court found that the Košice – okolie District Court had violated the applicant’s right under Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution to a hearing without unjustified

her right under Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution to a   hearing without unjustified delay.

    On 1 March 2006 the Constitutional Court decided that the Prešov District Court had violated the applicant's right under Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution to a   hearing without unjustified

They complained that the District Office of Investigation and the District Office of Prosecution had violated their right to a hearing “without unjustified delay” (Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution) and

Par ailleurs, aux termes de l’article 48-1 du même décret : « Le fonctionnaire qui, placé en disponibilité dans les conditions prévues par les articles 44, 45, 46 et au titre des 1° bis et 2° de l'article

The Constitutional Court found that the right under Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution to a hearing without unjustified delay did not extend to the applicant's claim for compensation filed in the context

“without unjustified delay” under Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution.