(c)     the lawful arrest or detention of a person effected for the purpose of bringing him before the competent legal authority on reasonable suspicion of having committed an offence or when

    On 16 August 2004 he was charged with fraud in Armenia and the Kentron and Nork-Marash District Court in Yerevan issued an arrest warrant. 6.

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention)

(c) the lawful arrest or detention of a person effected for the purpose of bringing him before the competent legal authority on reasonable suspicion of having committed an offence or when it is reasonably

    The present case concerns the applicants’ remand in custody pending trial and house arrest for an offence which was not clearly defined under domestic criminal law. THE FACTS 2.

At least two of them were cases of arrest and pre-trial detention in the context of criminal investigation (Gž.br.3924/12-11 and Gž.br. 347/2012-11).

(c) the lawful arrest or detention of a person effected for the purpose of bringing him before the competent legal authority on reasonable suspicion of having committed an offence or when it is reasonably

At 3 a.m. the prosecutor ordered her arrest for twenty ‑ four hours. 17 .

In the new arrest report the police referred to essentially the same circumstances as in the initial arrest report (see paragraph 7 above).

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention)

  (c)     the lawful arrest or detention of a person effected for the purpose of bringing him before the competent legal authority on reasonable suspicion of having committed an offence

The order was to be valid for an initial period of two months following the applicant’s arrest. 6.

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention)

However, no record of an administrative arrest was drawn up. 4.     On the same day, the applicant was taken to the Sabunchu District Court.

    On 7 June 2018 the Râșcani District Court examined the prosecutor’s application for the prolongation of the applicant’s remand in custody and ordered his house arrest for a period of thirty

The pre-trial detention decisions were issued by the magistrates’ courts located at the respective places of the applicants’ arrest.

Unacknowledged deprivation of liberty or delay in drawing up arrest report ( Belozorov v. Russia and Ukraine , no.   43611/02, §§ 113-15, 15   October 2015, Grubnyk v.

    Following their arrest and detention in police custody on the orders of the regional and provincial prosecutors’ offices, the applicants were placed in pre-trial detention on various dates

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention)