Those parts of burnt out houses that remained standing were demolished with pickaxes. Livestock was killed and the eggs of incubating hens were smashed.

They were represented before the Court by Ms A. van der Werff ‑ Dost, a lawyer practising in Utrecht. The Dutch Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms B.

Apart from that, the cells were properly lit, heated and ventilated and he had access to various activities outside the cells.

The applicants also complain invoking Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (b) and (d) that the domestic proceedings against them were unfair in particular because they were not given adequate time and facilities for

Those reports were filed between 5 and 14 July 1993.

The women and children were sent home. Dervis Karakoç's mother, the third applicant, says that she went home thinking her son had been arrested by the soldiers.

At the time of their arrest, they were in the house of Hafif Ay in Diyarbakır. They were taken to the rapid reaction force building in Diyarbakır and were blindfolded upon arrival.

On the morning of 12 March 1994, Nazım left his home where he lived with the applicant, and went to his office to work.

  245 of the Russian Federal Forces Group “West” ( 245   мотострелковый полк группировки федеральных сил «Запад» ). The servicemen were assisted by the local militia.

were applied were actually made.

In the course of the proceedings, the third applicant, the teenager son of the family went missing.

The next thing I knew we were inside the women’s toilet in [the bar] and had started kissing. Then we went out onto the dance-floor and danced for a bit.

However, as the defendants were still evading justice, the Assize Court was unable to reach a verdict on the merits.

In the course of that search a number of persons were questioned and various locations were visited and searched. 8.

They were held in the village with 49 people, of whom eleven were bound like Behcet. The hands of the others were free.

. # Offene Handelsgesellschaft in Firma Werner Faust mod Kommissionen for De Europæiske Fællesskaber. # Fælles markedsordning for frugt og grønsager - beskyttelsesforanstaltninger. # Sag 52/81.

#Université de Hambourg contre Hauptzollamt München-West.#Demande de décision préjudicielle: Finanzgericht München - Allemagne.

#Alpenhain-Camembert-Werk ym. vastaan Euroopan yhteisöjen komissio.#Asetus (EY) N:o 1829/2002 - Alkuperänimityksen rekisteröinti - "Feta" - Kumoamiskanne - Asiavaltuus - Tutkimatta jättäminen.

#Continentale Produkten-Gesellschaft Erhardt-Renken GmbH & Co. mod Hauptzollamt München-West.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse: Finanzamt München - Tyskland.