recognises that it must be cautious in taking on the role of a first ‑ instance tribunal of fact, where this is not rendered unavoidable by the circumstances of a particular case (see, for example, Solomou

    Entre-temps, respectivement les 18, 19 et 20, 29 octobre 1988, le requérant et la société Solomon Guggenheim Corporation avaient saisi le TAR d'une demande en annulation de la note du 1 er

would be impossible to track either direct and immediate cause or even sufficiently close proximity between the actions of the Georgian army proper and the effects produced on the applicants (contrast Solomou

applicant company’s rights justified a re-examination of the dispute and the resulting invalidation of the applicant company’s property title (see, similarly, Kehaya , cited above, §   76, and Solomun

view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings – final decision: Moscow City Court, 04/09/2019   4,000     1829/20 27/12/2019 Artem Aleksandrovich SOLOMIN

applicants are the Union of Private Clinics of Greece (representing all private clinics other than psychiatric clinics), a number of local unions of private clinics and the private clinic “Grigorios Solomos

A court's intervention in choosing between two parents may be compared to the judgment of Solomon.

    41042/21* 23/07/2021 Timofey Nikitich SOLOVOV 2000 Georgiy Eduardovich Tevosov Moscow Rally in support of Mr A.

light, no or restricted access to shower Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 12,500   7966/19 15/01/2019 Dmitriy Vadimovich SOLOMIN

  4,000     41042/21 23/07/2021 Timofey Nikitich SOLOVOV 2000 Tevosov Georgiy Eduardovich Moscow Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy   Moscow   03/02/2021 article 20.2 §   6.1

  Turkey , no. 27601/95, §   95, 31 May 2005, and Solomou and Others v.   Turkey , no. 36832/97, § 67, 24 June 2008). 63.

would be impossible to track either direct and immediate cause or even sufficiently close proximity between the actions of the Georgian army proper and the effects produced on the applicants (contrast Solomou

Under these circumstances Stelios Kalli Panayi must be regarded as “within [the] jurisdiction” of Turkey within the meaning of Article 1 (see, mutatis mutandis , Solomou and Others v.

absolutely necessary” for the achievement of one of the purposes set out in sub-paragraphs (a), (b) or (c) (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom , 27 September 1995, § 148, Series A no. 324, and Solomou

  Cyprus , 9 October 1997, § 171, Reports of Judgments and Decisions   1997 ‑ VI, Solomou and Others v.

Russia   15/10/2019 Ykalo Solomon TEWELDE 1995 Eritrean Military service 31 August 2018   Tesfamiryam Tekle MIRYAM 1992 Eritrean Military service 22 June 2018   Brhane Habtemichael BEILUL

  the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 27663/95, 22   June 1999; and Solomon v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 44328/98, 5   September 2000).

Muşchei, Victor Neagov, Iacob Ninescu, Ion Nicolaev, Mihai Nicolaev, Constantin Novac, Eugenia Paşcova, Ghenadie Petrea, Eduard Porumb, Eduard Pritula, Nicolae Pruteanu, Ion Puşcaş, Maria Serbu, Mariana Solomon

Final decision was taken by the Moscow City Court on 02/10/2019. 3,900   19311/20 23/03/2020 Solomon Maksimovich PANTELEYEV 2000   Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Pomazuyev Vilnius 03/08/2019 03/08/2019