CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

4 744 résultats pour « Sher MESSINGER »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-204969

Admin. suprême

8 septembre 2020

8 septembre 2020

of respective constituency electoral commissions and of the Central Electoral Commission, which are not already in respective case files, concerning the results of the examination of the signature sheets

Page 15 sur 238

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3199626-3566611

Admin. suprême

15 juillet 2010

15 juillet 2010

They breed sheep in the département of Cher.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0317DEC001199305

Admin. suprême

17 mars 2015

17 mars 2015

It found that the applicant’s share consisted of thirty-three thirty-sixths of plot A and eleven twenty-fourths of plot B.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0518DEC007800417

Admin. suprême

18 mai 2021

18 mai 2021

Through its shares in Egla hf., Hauck & Aufhäuser became the owner of 16.3% of the share capital in the Agricultural Bank of Iceland.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-99667

Admin. suprême

3 juin 2010

3 juin 2010

Pursuant to section 1(a) of the Regulation, the value of the applicant’s share thus determined was to be the opening price for public sale of the property.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0928DEC004709799

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2010

28 septembre 2010

Settlement proceedings had not been brought by the court as no request had been made to Slovenské telekomunikácie, š.p. to convene a meeting of creditors within the meaning of sections 4a(3) and 4(1) of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-196308

Admin. suprême

2 septembre 2019

2 septembre 2019

29 March 2017 the RNA published its report, concluding, inter alia , that a group of investors at the behest of the applicant had made secret deals behind the scenes to hide who actually owned the shares

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0703JUD002178007

Admin. suprême

3 juillet 2012

3 juillet 2012

Subsequently, the applicant herself had confirmed in writing that she had no objection to being transferred to the medium imprisonment regime where she would have to share a cell with several other convicts

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1216DEC002882703

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2008

16 décembre 2008

On 30 October 2001 the Court of First Instance divided the inheritance and allocated shares. The applicant together with P.R. – another party – appealed, as they had not agreed with the shares.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0718JUD001681217

Admin. suprême

18 juillet 2019

18 juillet 2019

    On 22 October 2004, at a partners’ meeting of Rustavi 2 Ltd, N.T. ceded his shares of Rustavi 2 Ltd in favour of the remaining two shareholders, K.K. and Panorama Ltd.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1211DEC006737001

Admin. suprême

11 décembre 2006

11 décembre 2006

    The criminal proceedings against the applicant Two robberies were committed on the nights of 24 July and 18 August 1996 whereby three sheep and five hogs were stolen.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1014DEC003122303

Admin. suprême

14 octobre 2008

14 octobre 2008

    General background The applicant owns a 50   % share in AB Imeks Ltd, a joint venture (hereinafter the “Company”).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-174729

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2017

31 mai 2017

    Can the applicants claim to be victims of a violation of the Convention, within the meaning of Article 34?   2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-150506

Admin. suprême

8 décembre 2014

8 décembre 2014

At the same time, she confirmed that at the time when she approached the applicant she was already an undercover agent of the DCS.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1218JUD003212402

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 2007

18 décembre 2007

with the Law on Meetings and Demonstration Marches (Law no. 2911).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0110JUD004814909

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2019

10 janvier 2019

She claimed that, by donating his part in the immovable property in 1997, her grandfather had infringed her right to a “reserved share” in his inheritance, given that the immovable property in question

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0629DEC003408202

Admin. suprême

29 juin 2006

29 juin 2006

detention though having been informed of this remedy in the Information Sheets she received.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-123756

Admin. suprême

11 juillet 2013

11 juillet 2013

It found that the applicant had not obtained property of the bearer shares in the EMK Engineering stock corporation in question and had not therefore validly represented 75% of the shares in the corporation

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-216992

Admin. suprême

25 mars 2022

25 mars 2022

She and some other minority shareholders instituted civil proceedings against the company, contesting some decisions taken by the shareholders’ meeting.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0319JUD002927816

Admin. suprême

19 mars 2019

19 mars 2019

account for at least 10% of the share capital.” 25 .

Source officielle