application, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay him the amounts detailed in the appended table.

application, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table.

conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.

applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table.

applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table.

applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table.

applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table.

Subsequently, Mr   Zdzisław Parkitny, the father of Sebastian Parkitny informed the Court that he wished to continue the proceedings.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.

conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.

The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations.

Răduleţu , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 25   January 2017, Having regard to the observations submitted by the

applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table.

As to legal systems which provide constitutional protection for fundamental rights, such as that of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Court reiterates that it is incumbent on the aggrieved individual to test

rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table.

conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.

The observations were forwarded to the applicants (to the applicant’s potential heirs in application no. 12488/21), who were invited to submit their own observations (see the appended table for the relevant

they posed to society. 12 .

Subsequently, in Vlad , cited above, §§   24-32, the Court considered it appropriate to apply an exception to the general principle that the effectiveness of a given remedy was to be assessed with