1990 finding the applicant's statements inconsistent.

    The applicant did not dispute the above findings by the domestic authorities.

Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 23 March

On 20 March 2007 the Oleksandrivka District Prosecutor’s Office (“the   Oleksandrivka Prosecutor’s Office”) quashed the decision of 14   February 2007 and on 21 March 2007 initiated criminal

MARXER                  G.B.

} Resolution CM/ResDH(2010)219 [1] Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Volovik against Ukraine   (Application No. 15123/03, judgment of 6 December 2007, final on 31 March

On 9 April 2013 the Baku Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding that the first-instance court’s decision was justified. B.

The judgment resulted in cancellation of the first instance court’s finding that the applicant was dismissed illegally. 10.     On 4 March 1999 the applicant was dismissed again.

Latvia (dec.), no. 33695/03, 17 March 2009). 19.

    On 19 March 2012 the applicant filed an objection against the detention order. 8.

  On 24 March 1986 the investigating judge also dismissed the third application, which had been made on 19 March. 10.

MARXER   Mr. H.C.

On 22 March 2011 the applicant amended her claim, seeking in addition the annulment of a sale contract for the impugned plot of land, concluded between N.S. and third parties on 7 July 2010.

On 22 March 2012 the Dubrovnik County Court dismissed the applicant’s appeal as ill-founded, upholding the first-instance judgment.

    On 18 March 2014 the Ohrid Court of First Instance (“the first-instance court”) upheld the civil claim against the applicants and a third defendant, finding that the claimants had also been

By a decision of 16 March 1998, the Croatian Pension Fund established that the degree of the applicant’s physical impairment amounted to 100% but dismissed his request to be granted compensation, finding

On 16 March 2007 the prison authorities prepared a court application for the release of Demyan Khadzhyradov on health grounds.

On 25 March 2021 the Constitutional Court refused to initiate constitutional review proceedings regarding section 72(3) of the State Judicial Council Act, finding that the scope of review of the Appeal

II case against Italy (Application No. 22716/93 - Interim Resolution DH (97) 18), finding a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, guaranteed by Article 8 of the Convention