In its view, this amount would constitute adequate redress and sufficient compensation for the impugned length of the said proceedings, and thus a reasonable sum as to quantum in the present case in the

In its view, this amount would constitute adequate redress and sufficient compensation for the impugned length of the said proceedings, and thus a reasonable sum as to quantum in the present case in the

In its view, this amount would constitute adequate redress and sufficient compensation for the impugned length of the said proceedings, and thus a reasonable sum as to quantum in the present case in the

with their health and their environment, and that their criminal conviction for tearing up transgenic corn plants – an operation which had, they alleged, been undertaken in the context of the debate surrounding

She also referred to the Court’s established case-law to the effect that, in any event, the authorities had to carry out the investigation of their own motion once the matter had come to their attention

    The applicants did not witness the abduction; their account is based on their relatives’ and neighbours’ recollection of the events. 8.

Accordingly, this part of the application should be struck out of the list. 2.

before the competent court under this Act.

The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Yuriy Zaytsev.

In this instance, this is undoubtedly the case.”

The Government thus considered that they had complied with their obligations under the Convention.

The Bulgarian Government (“the Government”) are represented by their Agent, Ms S. Atanasova, of the Ministry of Justice.

The applicant’s complaints were communicated to the Government on 5   January 2011, who submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits on 21 April 2011.

They were represented before the Court by Mr M. Nypl, a lawyer practising in Hradec Králové. The Czech Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr V.A.

The Court notes that the applicants performed their work voluntarily and that their entitlement to payment has never been denied.

the period of their studies.

    The applicants complained that the authorities had violated their right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions.

The Czech Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr V.A. Schorm, from the Ministry of Justice. A.

Ahmadov who came to the police station at their request committed acts of hooliganism in front of the police station and this fact was documented and the relevant record on the existence of the injuries

In the case of Isayev and Others v.