CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
soc
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2022:SO10885
19 octobre 2022
le pourvoi n° D 21-17.912 contre le jugement rendu le 16 avril 2021 par le tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre (contentieux des élections professionnelles), dans le litige les opposant à la société Akka High
Page 15 sur 1366
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-219249
25 août 2022
After the call for tender’s term expired, Mr A.G., who had not participated in the call for tenders lodged administrative proceedings with the High Court of Justice of the Balearic Islands (High Court
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3558
29 mai 2012
On 14 September 2009, on appeal, the Administrative Division of the High Court of Justice upheld the judgment of the lower court.
ECLI:CEDH:001-192392
13 mars 2019
Has the applicant’s confinement in the high security unit as of 19 June 2015 onwards and the restrictions imposed on him in connection with his placement in the high security unit attained
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1010DEC004136213
10 octobre 2024
Higher Court”) in identical cases were allegedly inconsistent. 2 .
ECLI:CEDH:002-5104
12 décembre 2002
It had been open to the applicant to challenge the injunction before the High Court.
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2013:SO00790
17 avril 2013
COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE SOCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Attendu, selon le jugement attaqué (tribunal d'instance de Vanves, 9 mai 2012), que, par requête du 4 mars 2012, la société Sogeti High
ECLI:CEDH:002-5342
16 mai 2002
He was arrested and brought before the High Court, which ordered his detention in St.
civ1
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2012:C101467
19 décembre 2012
tribunal de commerce de Roubaix-Tourcoing, les sociétés Ziegler France, Montgomery Transport SARL, Inko Trade Sro, Jaroslav Mateja ; que la première a soulevé une exception de litispendance au profit de la High
CASELAW;CLIN;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:002-43
17 janvier 2012
ce pouvoir est exercé par le juge du fond, et tous les détenus pour lesquels le « tariff » a été fixé par le ministre en vertu de l’ancienne pratique ont la possibilité de demander à la High
ECLI:CEDH:001-122669
20 juin 2013
On 11 December 2012 the High Court refused the application for an adjournment.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-551088-552888
The High Court’s order was renewed on the same basis on 18 July 1997.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0711DEC004279620
11 juillet 2023
On 13 August 2020 the Supreme Court refused the parents leave to appeal against the High Court’s judgment. 3.
ECLI:CEDH:001-193719
15 mai 2019
The applicant company appealed on points of law to the Higher Commercial Court of Ukraine. On 14 September 2010 the Higher Commercial Court of Ukraine upheld the decision of 18 May 2010.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0224JUD003390804
24 février 2011
[The High Court] shared his opinion ...
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0917DEC000388806
17 septembre 2009
of the High Court.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-108132
2 décembre 2011
High Court: 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0307DEC004539699
7 mars 2000
On 10 May 1994 L and her former husband settled the High Court proceedings.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0307DEC004912699
7 mars 2002
As regards the sentence imposed on the applicant and the two co-accused top executives the High Court held inter alia: “the High Court can concur entirely with ...the City Court ... regarding the penal
ECLI:CEDH:001-170241
7 décembre 2016
On 24 October 2011 the applicants requested the President of the High Court to transmit the case file to the Court of Appeal given that they had learnt that the file had been archived in the High Court