The Court held by five votes to two that there had been no violation of Article 5 § 1 (right to liberty and security).

been violated also under that head.

  The Court therefore held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 4.

Under the head of non ‑ pecuniary damage he claimed a sum of 200,520 Polish zlotys (approx.   42,660 euros). 47.     The Government did not comment on the applicant’s claim. 48.

The applicant alleges under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention that his detention constitutes ill-treatment and puts his life at risk given that he suffers from a serious heart condition.

the head of its Finance Department before the action was brought, and afterwards the head of the Legal Department.

On 23   October   1997 the court held a viewing of the site. A further hearing was held on 28   January   1998. 19.

    At the material time the applicant held the position of Head of the Department of Justice of the Sakhalin Region ( начальник Управления юстиции Сахалинской области ). 7.

The investigator held that the results of the inquiry had showed that the applicant’s injuries were self-inflicted, as a result of his hitting the bookcase with his head, and that the allegations of ill-treatment

By some means these tapes entered general circulation, for which the applicant was held responsible by the Sheikh.

The Court therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in these two cases.

a pamphlet in the course of an election campaign, the content of which was held to be defamatory by the French courts.

The Court awarded them NOK 375,000 under this head.

The head of the SMCA himself annulled the latter order on 29   May 2012. 11 .

In July 2002 two meetings of Old Orthodox believers had been held simultaneously, of comparable size and each claiming to be an “extraordinary general meeting of the RGVD”.

In 2008 the court of appeal held that the applicant’s statement withdrawing her claim was valid and dismissed the appeals lodged by both parties.

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE SOCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par la société Factofrance Heller, société anonyme, dont le siège est Tour Facto Cedex

    On the same day, following the pronouncement of the Warsaw ‑ Mokotów District Court’s decision, the Minister of Justice ‑ Prosecutor General and the Head of the CAB held a press

She noted that he suffered from a number of contagious diseases and could not therefore be held in detention.