GERMANY   The European Court of Human Rights has today delivered at a public hearing its Grand Chamber judgment [1] in the case of Sürmeli v. Germany (application no. 75529/01).

l'Union européenne doivent être interprétées à la lumière de celle-ci, notamment lorsqu'elle a elle-même été interprétée par la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne ; que dans son arrêt Volvo Car Germany

GERMANY   The European Court of Human Rights has declared admissible the application lodged in the case of von Hannover v. Germany (no. 59320/00).

Germany , no. 1057/02, CEDH 2004-III (extracts); Information Note no. 63).

children of the family to the father: inadmissible   The first applicant, a German national, left her Canadian husband in 1997.

The court held that the online version of the newspaper was accessible from Germany, and because it mentioned a German businessman in the article, the publication had a direct connection with Germany and

Pakelli case, delivered on 25 April 1983 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers;   Recalling that this case had its origin in an application against the Federal Republic of Germany

1] , all of German ethnic origin.

Federal Republic of Germany   The Federal Republic of Germany, represented by the Agent of the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany, Dr.

Germany (no. 38073/97)   Violation Article 6 § 1 H.T., a German national born in 1938 and living in Mettmann, brought proceedings challenging the constitutionality of a new law affecting her pension

    On 13 May 1992 the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) and the United States of America signed the German-US Agreement on the settlement of certain property claims – “the German-US Agreement

delivered on 28 June 1978 and 10 March 1980 and transmitted the same days to the Committee of Ministers;   Recalling that the case had its origin in the application against the Federal Republic of Germany

lodged on 10 January 2018 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant was born in the former German Democratic Republic and taken into care by the then competent authorities.

Sections18 and19 concern the members of diplomatic and consular missions, and section 20(1) other representatives of States staying in Germany upon the invitation of the German Government.

property in the German Democratic Republic in 1963.

    On 21 June 2005 the German legislator amended the German Pension Transfer Law.

The second applicant is the first applicant’s daughter, Miss India Dawn McCormack, a German and Australian national who was born out of wedlock on 16   April   2005 in Germany.

The applicant was against his daughter moving to Germany and revoked a declaration he had made before the German Embassy in Lisbon allowing his daughter to travel outside Portugal.

    The trial court established the facts of the case on the basis of an initial investigation carried out in Germany by the German authorities.