Turkey 17/08/2019 Lack of hearing during the detention review Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of reasonable suspicion 42 51075/19 Açar v.

On an unspecified date, criminal proceedings were instituted against police officers, who had questioned the applicant during his police custody.

the investigation and to Sa.L. and St.L.’s statements also given during the investigation.

The illicit drugs seized during those searches were thus adduced in evidence against the applicant. 7.

During the admission, he was stripped naked and made to wait for a further examination for more than an hour. During that time, he was mocked by the prison staff.

They testified that they had seen a person brake a glass window of a pharmacy during the demonstration.

    Treatment of the applicant during his arrest and subsequent detention 1.     Treatment of the applicant during his arrest 10.

He confirmed his submissions during his hearing before the criminal court.

SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 3 of the Convention relating to inadequate conditions of detention during transport which are the subject of well-established case

During those periods the applicant had had 2.9   sq.   m of personal space.

    The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport.

During the trial the applicant was confined in a metal cage. The only furniture in the cage was a wooden bench. The applicant could not take any notes during the hearing.

He also stated during a televised show that the applicant should have been demoted instead of promoted.

Türkiye 23/07/2019 Enver EVREN 1977 İzmir Turkish   Lack of hearing during the detention review   62865/19 Özdemir v.

B. during the pre-trial investigation, and also viewed a video record of O.B.’s statements.

    The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport.

In the meantime, the applicant filed a complaint with the public prosecutor, alleging that he had been ill-treated during his police custody.

The children, who were then aged over six and a half, were questioned during the preliminary investigation.

It found that C.’s submissions given during his first interview had been credible.