CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

11 354 résultats pour « Destailleur »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0904DEC003603516

Admin. suprême

4 septembre 2018

4 septembre 2018

    On 25 January 2018 the Court decided to give notice to the Government of the applicant’s complaints detailed above. 5.

Source officielle

Page 15 sur 568

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0709DEC004382619

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2020

9 juillet 2020

On 24 October 2019 the Court decided to give notice to the Government of the applicant’s complaints detailed above.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-8912

Admin. suprême

31 mars 1998

31 mars 1998

  Costs and expenses Applicants had neither quantified nor detailed their claims – claims dismissed (unanimously).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5550

Admin. suprême

26 février 2002

26 février 2002

Although the principle of fairness enshrined in Article 6 § 1 obliged courts to give sufficient reasons for their decisions, that obligation could not be understood as requiring a detailed answer to every

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0311DEC007260613

Admin. suprême

11 mars 2014

11 mars 2014

    On 25 November 2013 the Court decided to give notice to the Government of the applicants’ complaint detailed above. 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1896

Admin. suprême

14 octobre 2008

14 octobre 2008

The two journalists were acquitted, the first because the impugned remarks were general and vague, which precluded criminal liability in the absence of intent, and the second because no precise, detailed

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0607DEC005004806

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2016

7 juin 2016

On 26   August 2015 the Court decided to give notice to the Government of the applicant’s complaints detailed above.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-245410

Admin. suprême

16 septembre 2025

16 septembre 2025

These threats included electronic and regular letters with a detailed description of the sexual and obscene acts that these unknown individuals planned to take against her.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-249589

Admin. suprême

10 mars 2026

10 mars 2026

It held that the lower court’s conclusions were correct, that providing more detailed information would have jeopardised the protection of classified material, and that the SANS was the sole authority

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0510DEC000678106

Admin. suprême

10 mai 2011

10 mai 2011

At the same time the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b), to give notice to the Government of the applicant’s complaint detailed above but that the Government should not, at that stage, be invited to

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7591

Admin. suprême

4 juin 2013

4 juin 2013

However, the Court considered that it should be slow to find that such circumstances existed where a case had been the subject of careful and detailed examination by the domestic courts.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0928DEC000305106

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2010

28 septembre 2010

On 14 January 2010 the Court decided to give notice to the Government of the applicants' complaints detailed above.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10093

Admin. suprême

13 juillet 1995

13 juillet 1995

of detention (a) alleged lack of reasons in domestic decisions : on evidence, applicant well aware of why he was being kept in detention -admittedly desirable for Spanish courts to have given more detailed

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9702

Admin. suprême

20 septembre 1993

20 septembre 1993

identified him and several considerations militated in favour of this - on appeal applicant stressed inadequacy of the investigation; attitude of the court which went into substance of the matter and gave detailed

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0615DEC000058202

Admin. suprême

15 juin 2010

15 juin 2010

On 14 September 2006 the Court decided to give notice to the Government of the applicant's complaints detailed above.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-213741

Admin. suprême

2 novembre 2021

2 novembre 2021

  In that regard, the Government are required to provide detailed information about the conditions in which the applicant has been detained, including information about the size of each of the applicant

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1113DEC000206214

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2018

13 novembre 2018

    On 23 March 2018 the Court decided to give notice to the Government of the applicant’s complaint detailed above. 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1013DEC003158812

Admin. suprême

13 octobre 2015

13 octobre 2015

On 23 September 2013 the Court decided to give notice to the Government of the applicant’s complaints detailed above.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-90

Admin. suprême

13 mars 2012

13 mars 2012

The inquest had constituted a detailed examination of the circumstances of the applicant’s son’s death but could not examine individual civil liability.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0125DEC000692707

Admin. suprême

25 janvier 2011

25 janvier 2011

On 29 January 2010 the Court decided to give notice to the Government of the applicants’ complaint detailed above.

Source officielle