has previously held on many occasions that normally the six-month period runs from the final decision in the process of exhaustion of domestic remedies (see, among many other authorities, Paul and Audrey

Fairness of proceedings, independence and impartiality of court Article 14: “In administering justice in criminal matters, judges are independent and obey only the law.

Cell no. 4. has two two-tier wooden beds with mattresses.

    The Government reiterated that the applicant had not complained to the domestic authorities (prosecutor, prison administration) of the alleged ill-treatment by his cell-mates and made reference

of the Convention that Adnan Akhmadov had disappeared after having been detained by Russian servicemen and that the domestic authorities had failed to carry out an effective investigation into the matter

the domestic laws which protect the right to life and, in those cases involving State agents or bodies, to ensure their accountability for deaths occurring under their responsibility (see Paul and Audrey

steps to safeguard the lives of those within their jurisdiction (see, for example, L.C.B. v. the United Kingdom , 9 June 1998, §   36, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-III, and Paul and Audrey

It also acknowledged that he had a right to compensation in respect of pecuniary damage but decided to transfer the matter to a civil court for examination because it was impossible to make a precise calculation

Therefore the Public Prosecutor concluded that he lacked jurisdiction ratione materiae and ratione personae in this matter.

under Article 2 of the Convention that their relative had been deprived of his life by Russian servicemen and that the domestic authorities had failed to carry out an effective investigation of the matter

The essential purpose of such an investigation is to secure the effective implementation of the domestic laws which protect the right to life (see, mutatis mutandis , Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United

The essential purpose of such an investigation is to secure the effective implementation of the domestic laws which protect the right to life (see, mutatis mutandis , Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United

adequate provision for securing high professional standards among health professionals and the protection of the lives of patients – which was not contested in the present case – it cannot accept that matters

    Until 1 July 2002 criminal-law matters were governed by the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (Law of 27 October 1960, “the old CCrP”).

measures within the scope of their powers, which, judged reasonably, might have been expected to avoid that risk (see   Keenan ,   cited above,   § 90,   and   Paul and   Audrey

under Article 2 of the Convention that their relative had been deprived of his life by Russian servicemen and that the domestic authorities had failed to carry out an effective investigation of the matter

    Article 35 § 1 cannot be interpreted in a manner which would require an applicant to seize the Court of his complaint before his position in connection with the matter has been finally settled

In all other situations, the complaint under Article 125 should be left without examination and the complainant be informed that he or she can raise the matter before the trial or/and appeal courts in

of the Convention that their relative had disappeared after having been detained by Russian servicemen and that the domestic authorities had failed to carry out an effective investigation into the matter