Owing to the particular circumstances of the case, the Court accepted that the applicants had been unable to complain about the events to the national authorities for a long period after the attack on

On 24 January 2015 the Ukrainian law enforcement authorities initiated criminal proceedings into the attack.

Similar attacks followed on its successor, Özgur Ülke .

In October 2007 a special bench of the Assize Court made up of seven professional judges found the applicant guilty as charged for his part in three terrorist attacks that had been committed in July and

According to the Government, an informant had given the police the address of a flat where the three persons in question were preparing to carry out an armed attack.

Swiss national, complained about the length of the proceedings concerning her release, following her arrest and detention on remand (lasting thirty-four days) on suspicion of involvement in various attacks

The group was trying to attack the applicants and take away their posters. One of the attackers injured the first applicant’s face while trying to reach for her poster.

On 25 June 2007 the applicant applied to the SGK, requesting that the terms of his retirement be assessed under Law no. 3713 (the Prevention of Terrorism Act), which afforded victims of terrorist attacks

Doan ; - les observations de Me Atiback, avocat de permanence représentant M. B ; - et les observations de Me El Haïk, représentant le préfet de police. Considérant ce qui suit : 1. M.

    The applicant's account of the attack on her 8.     In April 2004 the applicant produced a detailed account of the attack on her.

    The attack of 13 October 2005 and subsequent events 6 .

    Alleged attack on the applicant The applicant was a columnist with the Yeni Musavat newspaper.

The attackers had seized V.G.’s personal belongings, including his official firearm. 9 .

The applicant applied to the Constitutional Court, complaining that the judicial authorities had not protected him from the alleged attacks on his honour and reputation through the contested press articles

When the applicant was outside the court, a group of men wearing National Guard of Ukraine uniforms observed and verbally supported the attack, and one of them kicked the applicant.

Criminal proceedings concerning the attack of 23 January 2000 On 4 March 2002 the applicant applied to the Grozny Town Prosecutor, described the attack on the civilian convoy on 23 January 2000 and her

    Attack of 16 July 2002 The facts of the attack at the applicant’s house are disputed by the parties.

A penalty for the attack on the officer, which was a punishable act, did not constitute persecution either.

(the owners of the house), who had appeared to be the people most in danger of attack.