que modifié par l’article 48 § 2 de la loi n o   3772/2009, au motif qu’elle séjournait en Grèce sans posséder les documents administratifs nécessaires.

He requested that the Constitutional Court find as follows: “The Bratislava III District Court violated the applicant’s right under Article 48(2) of the Constitution to a hearing without unjustified delay

He asserted a violation of his right to a hearing “without unjustified delay” under Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution and his right to a hearing “within a reasonable time” under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention

    Article 48(2) of the Constitution provides, inter alia , that every person has the right to have his or her case tried without unjustified delay. 25.

    Article 48 (2) of the Constitution provides, inter alia , that every person has the right to have his or her case tried without unjustified delay. 52.

    The Constitution Article 48(2) of the Constitution provides, inter alia , that every person has the right to have his or her case tried without unjustified delay.

    Article 48(2) provides, inter alia , that every person has the right to have his or her case tried without unjustified delay. 56.

  Le 27 juin 1996, la Commission a décidé, en application de l'article 48 § 2 b) de son Règlement intérieur, de donner connaissance de la requête au gouvernement mis en cause, et d'inviter les parties

On 10 September 2003 the Constitutional Court found that the Bratislava   I District Court had violated the applicant’s right to a hearing “without unjustified delay” (Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution

It found that the District Court had failed to afford the applicant a chance to correct shortcomings in her action before discontinuing the proceedings, as required under Article 43 § 2 of the Code of

On 3 June 2004 the Constitutional Court found that the District Court had violated the applicant’s right to a hearing “without unjustified delay” (Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution) and “within a reasonable

    Le 16 octobre 1995, la Commission a décidé, en application de l'article 48 § 2 b) de son Règlement intérieur, de donner connaissance de la requête au gouvernement mis en cause, et d'inviter

    On 23 November 2000, on the applicant’s petition ( podnet ), the Constitutional Court ( Ústavný súd ) found that the District Court had violated his right under Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution

On 5   November 2003 the Constitutional Court found a violation of the applicant’s right under Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution to a hearing without unjustified delay, awarded him SKK 25,000 (equivalent

April 2006 the Constitutional Court (Third Chamber) found that the Martin District Court had violated, and that the District Courts in Žilina and in Čadca had not violated, the applicant’s right under Article

Relying on Articles 48 § 2 and 127 of the Constitution, he complained that the length of the proceedings in his action of 1996 had been excessive. 15.

    On 6 October 2005 the Constitutional Court found that the Žilina District Court had violated the applicant's right under Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution to a hearing without unjustified

    On 14 February 2006 the Constitutional Court found that the Považská Bystrica District Court had violated the applicant’s right under Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution to a hearing without

    Le 16 octobre 1995, la Commission a décidé, en application de l'article 48 § 2 b) de son Règlement intérieur, de donner connaissance de la requête au gouvernement mis en cause, et d'inviter