Turkey, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Françoise Tulkens, President,   Ireneu Cabral Barreto,   Vladimiro Zagrebelsky,   Danutė

Turkey , The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Françoise Tulkens, President,   Ireneu Cabral Barreto,   Vladimiro Zagrebelsky,   Danutė

The Constitutional Court considered that the limitation had become a disproportionate interference with the right to property as a result of the economic crisis of February 2001 in Turkey.

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 30   June 2009 as a Chamber composed of:   Françoise Tulkens, President,   Ireneu Cabral Barreto,   Vladimiro Zagrebelsky

Turkey , [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI).

Turkey , no. 51423/99, §§   48-50, 24   April 2008), that is when the Ankara Labour Court’s decision of 13   October 2003 became final on 7 January 2004.

Turkey judgment (nos. 70084/01 and 70085/01, §§ 26-28, 19 September 2006).

    On 28 February 2006 Interpol Ashgabat, apparently at the request of the Turkmen authorities, announced by way of a red notice that the applicant was wanted by the Turkmen authorities.

  Principal facts   The applicant, Mr Ahmet Beyazgül, is a Turkish national who was born in 1924 and lives in Van (Turkey). His application was also lodged on behalf of his wife.

:3.43pt; display:inline-block } .s171D8724 { width:201.53pt; display:inline-block } SECOND SECTION PARTIAL DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 39861/06 by Ahmet İlhan TARHAN against Turkey

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 12   February 2008 as a Chamber composed of:   Françoise Tulkens, President ,   Antonella Mularoni,   Rıza Türmen, &

{ width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } SECOND SECTION FINAL DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 29643/05 by Türkan ARAS against Turkey

display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 23980/08 by Ali ABDOLLAHI against Turkey

inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 4750/04 by Veysel TURHAN against Turkey

inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 21385/07 by Mehmet Şefik ÖZTEKİN against Turkey

Kireçkaya, a lawyer practising in İzmir (Turkey). The Government of Turkey (“the Government”) did not designate an Agent for the purposes of the proceedings before the Court. 3.

Turkey , The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Françoise Tulkens, President,   Ireneu Cabral Barreto,   Danutė Jočienė,   András Sajó

TURKEY   The European Court of Human Rights has delivered at a public hearing today a judgment in the case of Tahsin Acar v. Turkey (application no. 26307/95).

Turkey, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Françoise Tulkens, President,   Ireneu Cabral Barreto,   Vladimiro Zagrebelsky,   Danutė

(Serbia), Nona Tsotsoria (Georgia), Işıl Karakaş (Turkey), Kristina Pardalos (San Marino), judges,   and Stanley Naismith, Deputy Section Registrar.