with that speed”.

d'affermage au stade de l'examen des offres ; 2°) à titre subsidiaire, en ce qui concerne le lot n° 1, de réformer le classement comme suit : 1er : groupement OCCELIA B (note de 8,65), 2nd : société SPEED

Judgment 23.9.1998 Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Access to court Criminal charge Deduction of one-third of the points allocated to a driving licence resulting from the offence of exceeding the speed

They assumed that the motorcycle’s speed was around 170-180 km/h.

Russia , no. 9659/18   Did the length of the proceedings in the present case, by which the applicant sought to challenge house arrest order of 10 November 2017 comply with the “speed” requirement

As regards the road, the Board noted that it was the main transportation route in the area, that it was paved, that the maximum authorised speed was 70 km/hour, and that it was used by public transport

de droit italien INA Assitalia SPA venant aux droits de la société Assitalia Le Assicurazioni d'Italia SPA ; que la société SAA a confié, à son tour, le transport à la société de droit italien Corsi Sped

#Hamann International GmbH Spedition + Logistik contre Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt.#Demande de décision préjudicielle: Bundesfinanzhof - Allemagne.

. # Spedition Wilhelm Rotermund GmbH mot Europeiska kommissionen. # Gemenskapens tullkodex - Eftergift av importtull - Särskild situation - Bedrägeri begånget inom ramen för ett externt gemenskapstransiteringsförfarande

#Hamann International GmbH Spedition + Logistik gegen Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt.#Ersuchen um Vorabentscheidung: Bundesfinanzhof - Deutschland.

#Haniel Spedition GmbH tegen Commissie van de Europese Gemeenschappen.#Verordening (EEG) nr. 2200/87 van de Commisie - Inhouding op betalingen ter zake van voedselhulp.#Zaak C-226/89.

It further noted that the lack of a speedy review of an order remanding a person in custody did not constitute a ground for a habeas corpus application under Article 222 of the Code and pointed out that

    In a judgment of 13 September 2011 the Constitutional Court found a   violation of the applicant’s right to a “speedy” review of the lawfulness of his detention under Article 5 § 4 of

    On 30 March 2010 the Constitutional Court issued a judgment ( nález ) finding a violation of the applicant’s right to a speedy review of the lawfulness of his detention within the meaning

. # Hannl + Hofstetter Internationale Spedition GmbH contro Finanzlandesdirektion für Wien, Niederösterreich und Burgenland. # Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale: Verwaltungsgerichtshof - Austria. # Codice

d'affermage du service de l'eau industrielle " du marché d'assistance pour la passation de contrats d'affermage, dans la limite de vingt jours ; - d'annuler la décision d'attribution du marché à la société SPEED

#Leonhard Knubben Speditions GmbH v Hauptzollamt Mannheim.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Bundesfinanzhof - Germany.

on Human Rights and, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 4 (right to have lawfulness of detention decided speedily by a court) of the Convention on account of the lack of a speedy