CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD004368598
22 septembre 2009
no. 4269 of 23 January 1970; (d) plot no. 140, sheet/plan XI/24W2, source of running water, registered for the 1/224 share in the name of the applicant. 11.
Page 14 sur 238
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0910DEC000621402
10 septembre 2002
In 1982 the applicant’s ex-wife donated her share in the disputed property to A.H. and E.H., who became parties to the proceedings.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1005DEC003621103
5 octobre 2006
share at the market price in order to pay the debt.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1017DEC006397209
17 octobre 2017
The applicants complained under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention that they were illegally deprived of their shares in Demirbank and could not receive any compensation for their loss.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0403DEC003122303
3 avril 2006
They own 50% and 49% shares respectively of AB Imeks Ltd, a joint company (hereinafter “the Company”). The first applicant was born in 1942 and lives in Kyiv.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1012DEC002954495
12 octobre 1999
After an oral hearing, it found, so far as relevant, that the share had passed with a transfer of the land to a third party in 1949 (as rectified in 1952).
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0505JUD002225216
5 mai 2026
Before the domestic courts and the Court, the applicant argued that his share of the property measured 192.8 sq. m (see paragraph 5 above).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1030JUD004870407
30 octobre 2012
In accordance with their shares, the two applicants claimed EUR 60,000 for each of them. 31.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0710DEC003042603
10 juillet 2007
From that date, all shares of the shareholders were withdrawn and annulled.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-71062
12 octobre 2005
violation of the right to a fair trial) (Application No. 33286/96) Interim Resolutions DH(99)258, DH(2002)30 and DH(2004)13 (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 12 October 2005, at the 940th meeting
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0412DEC002772195
12 avril 1996
by Overseas ($7.5m) and the sale price of the shares ($431m).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1023DEC004984510
23 octobre 2012
B. claiming to be the true owner of shares held by him constituting a ninety percent share of the applicant company. K.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0113DEC003975498
13 janvier 2000
On 25 July 1995 the applicant company filed an action with the Bratislava City Court ( Mestský súd) claiming that it was entitled to obtain 51 per cent of the shares of another limited company
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1022JUD000220411
22 octobre 2015
at least twenty-four hours prior to the ConEC meeting to decide on the applicant’s registration; (f) the applicant’s presence at the ConEC meeting of 11 October 2010 had not been ensured
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0629DEC005383500
29 juin 2004
The applicant, who was in possession of shares in a housing company, refused to deliver those shares to O.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0611JUD000768722
11 juin 2024
, (b) order the Agency to transfer the corresponding number of shares from its portfolio to them, and (c) order the bank to record them as holders of that number of shares in the bank’s register of shareholders
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1211JUD003648007
11 décembre 2018
In accordance with section 445 of the Act, members whose capital contributions amounted to at least one tenth of the total share capital could demand the convening of a general meeting; if so, they were
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-245451
18 septembre 2025
The applicants learnt about the destruction of the apartments from their colleague on 11/08/2022, via the messenger. They lost access to the car on 27/03/2022 after fleeing from Popasna.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0917DEC001383205
17 septembre 2009
The offer was accepted for 20,000 ordinary shares and 20 founder’s shares. The investor made an advance payment of CYP 1,200.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0220DEC000892813
20 février 2024
The Court notes the applicant company’s arguments that its bank account and shares in real estate had been seized by bailiffs.