an effective remedy for grievances similar to those of the applicants, allowing them to have the violation of the Convention acknowledged, either explicitly or in substance, and to receive adequate and

circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.

circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.

application, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table.

conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.

He further submitted that access to toilet was upon request only, showering was scheduled twice a week, and the access to medical assistance was also restricted to twice a week and subject to a prior request

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 13 May 2026.

conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.

this application, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them, jointly, the amounts detailed in the appended table.

As they had failed to do so, they should not receive the sums awarded to the deceased applicants. 6.

conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.

The court also observed that it was necessary to limit survivors’ pensions to those who were married, in the context of limited social-security resources and the many needs to be met.

application, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay him the amounts detailed in the appended table.

The Government submitted the declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the applications.

The Government submitted declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the applications.

They further requested the Court to strike out the applications.

The Government submitted declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the applications.

lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.

The court left the appeal without examination on 4 February 2013, since the applicant, not being a party to the proceedings, did not have a right to appeal.