9 of the Rules of Court - to allow applicants, High Contracting Parties and the Court to handle the difficulties to which the global pandemic and widespread lockdown had given rise.

the lawyer who would represent him (Rule 30).

62 § 2 of the Rules of Court. 7.

62 § 2 of the Rules of Court. 7.

62 § 2 of the Rules of Court. 6.

62 § 2 of the Rules of Court. 6.

        On 19 May 1994 the Commission decided in accordance with Rule 50 para. 1 (b) of its Rules of Procedure to obtain the parties' oral submissions on the admissibility

39 of the Rules of Court, Having regard to the decision to grant priority to the above applications under Rule 41 of the Rules of Court, Having regard to the decision to grant anonymity to A.F. under

They accordingly asked for the judgment to be revised within the meaning of Rule 80 of the Rules of Court. 4.

that it had given a decision which in his view was arbitrary in the light of those rules.

) Pursuant to Rule 162 § 1 of the Rules [of the Assembly] ... ( chanting from ‘BSP for Bulgaria’: ‘Resign!’

required to appoint a representative in accordance with Rule 36 §§ 2 and 4 of the Rules of Court, which provides, in so far as relevant: “...

The applicant was also advised that pursuant to Rule 36 §§ 2 and 4 of the Rules of Court, he was required to be represented by an “advocate” before the Court.

    In accordance with Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court, the President of the Court, Mr L. Wildhaber, assigned the case to the Second Section.

Rule 36 of the Rules of Court, as relevant, reads: “1.

62 § 2 of the Rules of Court. 4 .

34 paras. 1 (a), 3 and 4 of Rules of Court B,   1.

34 paras. 1 (a), 3 and 4 of Rules of Court B,   1.

34 paras. 1 (a), 3 and 4 of Rules of Court B,   1.