CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

1 875 571 résultats pour « Party »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECGRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0209DEC003125396

Admin. suprême

9 février 2000

9 février 2000

It was true that Article 11 of that treaty provided the following:     “A Contracting Party cannot claim immunity from the jurisdiction of a court of another Contracting Party in proceedings

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0210DEC002569394

Admin. suprême

10 février 2000

10 février 2000

Written grounds of the judgment were sent to the parties on 19 May 1995.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0229DEC002892395

Admin. suprême

29 février 2000

29 février 2000

  Particular circumstances of the case     The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0229DEC002420994

Admin. suprême

29 février 2000

29 février 2000

  According to his statement, the applicant's son Yetişen was a member of the PKK (Labour Party of Kurdistan).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0316DEC003176496

Admin. suprême

16 mars 2000

16 mars 2000

in the case, unless such hearing of   the parties was manifestly unnecessary.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0316DEC002934695

Admin. suprême

16 mars 2000

16 mars 2000

in the case, unless such hearing of   the parties was manifestly unnecessary.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0316DEC002880895

Admin. suprême

16 mars 2000

16 mars 2000

Thus, the Court finds that this part of the application cannot be rejected as being out of time.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0321DEC004078798

Admin. suprême

21 mars 2000

21 mars 2000

    Having regard to the parties’ submissions, the Court finds that this part of the application raises serious issues of law under the Convention, the determination of which must be reserved

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0108DEC003564097

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2002

8 janvier 2002

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0219DEC006590501

Admin. suprême

19 février 2002

19 février 2002

No other grounds for declaring those parts of the application   inadmissible have been established.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0221DEC003502197

Admin. suprême

21 février 2002

21 février 2002

On 6 November 1996 the Supreme Board, having held a public hearing, partly dismissed the applicants’ appeals.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0312DEC004178498

Admin. suprême

12 mars 2002

12 mars 2002

for waiver of court fees when it is necessary for the protection of the party’s interests.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4703

Admin. suprême

4 septembre 2003

4 septembre 2003

Admissible under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 as regards the eight applicants who were parties to the domestic proceedings. The question of exhaustion of domestic remedies was joined to the merits.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0904DEC005417800

Admin. suprême

4 septembre 2003

4 septembre 2003

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0909DEC002774495

Admin. suprême

9 septembre 2003

9 septembre 2003

A party is entitled to a legally valid decision in respect of every de facto restriction on contact.”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0916DEC005619300

Admin. suprême

16 septembre 2003

16 septembre 2003

On 11 November 1998 and on 10 March 1999 the judge arranged for the Regional Court's decision to be served on the parties.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0916DEC000051502

Admin. suprême

16 septembre 2003

16 septembre 2003

The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0923DEC005021099

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2003

23 septembre 2003

Partly to protect your privacy, only the head of security or his deputy will listen to such tape recordings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0923DEC005398400

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2003

23 septembre 2003

An interview with Michel Junot was also published as part of the investigation. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0925DEC006952901

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2003

25 septembre 2003

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 1.

Source officielle

Page 14 sur 93779

← PrécédentSuivant →