March 2001 by reclassifying the applicants’ actions as affray and theft.

Jebens, judges , and Mr S.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Lehtonen v.

Il a établi la valeur des terrains selon le marché immobilier à cette date à 6   503   622,02 EUR.

    Le 16 mai 2000, le requérant se pourvut en cassation.

  Royaume-Uni, arrêt du 28 mai 1985, série A n o 94, p. 39, § 82).

    Between May 1998 and March 1999 the District Court scheduled eight hearings.

Barbieri, Jessel, David, Jobert, conseillers, MM. Béghin, Jariel, Mme Aldigé, conseillers référendaires, M.

légaux domiciliés en cette qualité audit siège Représentant : Me Mélina PEDROLETTI, Postulant, avocat au barreau de VERSAILLES, vestiaire : 626 - N° du dossier 00022002 Représentant : Me Olivier JESSEL

In the context of that investigation, the applicant and other witnesses of the detention were only questioned in October 2000 and March 2001.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

On 17 May 2003 the District Prosecutor’s Office informed the third applicant that on 15 March 2001 they had questioned Iznovr Serbiyev’s wife and granted her victim status in the proceedings.

Madame [K] [L], son mari et sa fille ont relevé appel de ce jugement.

Jebens, judges , and Mr S.

Austria (dec.), no. 31093/96, 7   March 2000).

  The applicant lodged an appeal on points of law which was dismissed by the Federal Court of Justice in May 2004.

    On 22 March 2002 a prosecutor ordered the applicant’s arrest and placement in custody. On 17 May 2002 the prosecutor extended the applicant’s detention until 20 June 2002. 32.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Elcomp sp. z o.o. v.

As to the appeal against non-seizure and the question of venue, hearings were held in the High Court on 6 January and 7 March 1994, and by a decision of 21   March 1994 the High Court upheld the City