CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

286 résultats pour « Kinga FIL »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1029JUD001747509

Admin. suprême

29 octobre 2013

29 octobre 2013

The case file shows that the new variant had been necessary because the original plan had accidentally included an area comprising an aqueduct.

Page 14 sur 15

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0221JUD002338994

Admin. suprême

21 février 1996

21 février 1996

   As a result of the Divisional Court’s decision, Mr Singh received a complete file of the documents which were before the Parole Board.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0915JUD001560207

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 2016

15 septembre 2016

He also supplied the prosecuting authorities with the original files relating to all four shipments from Guyana.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0831DEC001739190

Admin. suprême

31 août 1994

31 août 1994

Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;         Having regard to the application introduced on 17 September 1990 by S.E. against Norway and registered on 5 November 1990 under file

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-122671

Admin. suprême

20 juin 2013

20 juin 2013

He had replied:   “It was clear for [sic] all the files that the destination of the load was England.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0424JUD005063609

Admin. suprême

24 avril 2014

24 avril 2014

The relevant part of the judgment reads as follows: “It is not clear from the file whether the applicant continued to pursue the agricultural activity on the occupied territory, and even if she did, she

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1975:0221JUD000445170

Admin. suprême

21 février 1975

21 février 1975

By Order of 12 October 1973, he decided that the Government should file a memorial within a time-limit expiring on 3l January 1974 and that the Delegates should be entitled to file a memorial in reply

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0603DEC005711610

Admin. suprême

3 juin 2014

3 juin 2014

were lodged by three Ukrainian nationals, Mrs   Ganna Kostyantynivna Kolesnyk (“the first applicant”), Mrs Larysa Oleksandrivna Navrotska (“the second applicant”) and Mrs Svetlana Vyacheslavovna Fil

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0305JUD003757105

Admin. suprême

5 mars 2013

5 mars 2013

  As there is nothing in the case file to suggest that the domestic courts would have ruled any differently at a later stage, the Court considers that requiring the applicants to initiate yet another

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0219JUD002162793

Admin. suprême

19 février 1997

19 février 1997

   In 1987, in the course of routine investigations into other matters, the police came into possession of a number of video films which were made during sado-masochistic encounters involving

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000233403

Admin. suprême

19 février 2009

19 février 2009

    The case file shows that, following judicial proceedings which ended in 2005, the applicant received separate compensation for the land on which the building was constructed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1202DEC001739190

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 1992

2 décembre 1992

Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;         Having regard to the application introduced on 17 September 1990 by S.E. against Norway and registered on 5 November 1990 under file

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1213JUD004570199

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2001

13 décembre 2001

    However, following a reform of the Moldovan judicial system, the file was sent to the Moldovan Court of Appeal for trial de novo . 22.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0710JUD002669595

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 1998

10 juillet 1998

    On 27 February 1998 the Commission produced the file on the proceedings before it, as requested by the Registrar on the President’s instructions. 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0722JUD001565322

Admin. suprême

22 juillet 2025

22 juillet 2025

complaint was that there existed little evidence of successful Russian interference because insufficient investigative efforts had been made to collect that evidence, a public inquiry would not be able to fill

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0111JUD007304901

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2007

11 janvier 2007

alleges that Budějovický Budvar has only been marketing beer under the “Budweiser” name since 1895, whereas Budějovický Budvar says that it has been entitled to use that appellation since 1265, when King

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1028JUD002678095

Admin. suprême

28 octobre 1999

28 octobre 1999

The court also made the reinstatement of his right to drive conditional on his being medically certified fit to drive. It gave the following reasons for its decision: “1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1124JUD001746707

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2015

24 novembre 2015

The court observed an abundance of documents in the case file which indicated that the applicant wished to be compensated in cash.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1117JUD006350811

Admin. suprême

17 novembre 2016

17 novembre 2016

    If it follows from the content of the disputed transaction that it may not be terminated until a future date, the court, while declaring the transaction invalid, shall fix a future date for

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1027JUD000800107

Admin. suprême

27 octobre 2016

27 octobre 2016

    The Court observes that the reasons advanced by the Government for not adjourning the hearing of 25 September 2006 are not supported by the case file.

Source officielle