regard to the above application lodged on 30 April 2009, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Adam Ostrowski, was a Polish national who was born in 1928 and died on 16 March

    The applicants complained of the excessive length of civil proceedings and of the impossibility of lodging an application under Law No. 89 of 24   March 2001, known as the “Pinto Act

On 31   March 2010 the President of the Fourth Section decided to communicate the applicant's complaint under Article 6   §   1 of the Convention concerning the length of civil proceedings

, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : A0755 Assistée par : Me Jean Michel GASTON, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : A883 substituant Me Anne DI GIOVANNI-MEIER, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : A0755

It was served on the applicant on 10   March 2003. On 14 March 2003 the debtor lodged with the same court his objection to the making of the order.

  The Commission referred the cases to the Court on 6 March 1999.

In March 1992, the Board and the police applied for the cancellation of the licences which allowed the applicant’s casinos to operate.

Turkey   Thursday, 25 March 1999 at 9 a.m.   The applicant     The case concerns an application (application no.

Mr Giovanni submitted that on 21 March 1998 he was in Diyarbakır together with other Italian and European delegation members in order to monitor the events on the day of Newroz.

the terms of Article   32 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”), Having regard to the report drawn up on 10 March

the terms of Article   32 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”), Having regard to the report drawn up on 10 March

drawn up on 22 April 1999 by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 18 January 1996 by an Italian national, Mr Giovanni

drawn up on 27 May 1998 by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 5 February 1997 by an Italian national, Mr Giovanni

the terms of Article   32 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”), Having regard to the report drawn up on 4 March

Convention”),   Having regard to the report drawn up on 16 April 1996 by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 16 March

”),   Having regard to the report drawn up on 22 October 1996 by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 24 March

21 January 1998 by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 29 November 1993 by an Italian national, Mr   Giovanni

Convention”), Having regard to the report drawn up on 8 July 1998 by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 27 March

TATARU against Moldova The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 27   January 2009 as a Chamber composed of:   Nicolas Bratza, President,   Lech Garlicki,   Giovanni

On 27 February 2001 the applicant wrote back to the IR and on 5 March 2001 they reiterated their reply.