The applicant then only visited the child and the twins.

If the child lives permanently with one parent, the manner of the other parent maintaining contact with the child shall be determined by the parents jointly, having regard to the welfare of the child and

child (see paragraphs 8 and 9 above).

On these occasions, either the child was ill or the weather was bad or the child did not want to go out.

    On 3   February 2016 the Riga City Ziemeļu District Court upheld R.A.’s request to return the child to Ireland under the Hague Convention on the civil aspects of international child

The child was attending kindergarten. His father’s family was very attached to the child and the child was able to develop well, surrounded by a loving family atmosphere.

Her ideas about child-rearing appear very positive.

    The applicant’s child was born on 4 August 2014. The father had formally recognised the child.

intended to stay in Gozo with their child.

harm or otherwise place the child in an intolerable situation.

The child was present when the scene occurred. 12.

The child was constantly in fear and a conflict of loyalties.

The Australian court decided that T. and the applicant had joint custody of the child and that the case would be further reviewed once the child was returned to Australia.

The 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child Article 3 “1.

uncertainty as regards the status of the child.

, except when it contradicted the interests of the child.

He did not agree to let K.P. and the child leave Italy too. In the applicant’s absence that day, K.P. ran away with the child.

X and Y sought judicial review of the initial refusal to grant child benefit.

She agreed to stay at a parent ‑ child institution for three months after the child was born, so that her ability to give the child adequate care could be assessed. 14.