to the fact that the applicant’s civil action lodged in the course of the criminal proceedings had not been examined by the courts until 2009, the Government did not take a position on whether this matter

xa0; In its Resolution of 10 February 2009 the Plenary Supreme Court of Russia considered that the above judicial review proceedings should not prejudge issues which could subsequently be the subject-matter

Rule 36(2) specifically provides that neither the Coroner nor the jury shall express any opinions on any other matters.

When she returned from the woods she had reported the matter to the Croatian Army and had been given food by some soldiers, who had also buried her father. 11.

Thus, it considers that these matters fall to be examined below under the relevant substantive provisions of the Convention. III.

Thus, it considers that these matters fall to be examined below under the substantive provisions of the Convention. II.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 2 OF THE CONVENTION 43.

The Court would stress in this regard that the evaluation of the evidence and the establishment of the facts is a matter for the Court, and it is incumbent on it to decide on the evidentiary value of the

Thus, it considers that these matters fall to be examined below under the substantive provisions of the Convention. III.

Thus, it considers that these matters fall to be examined below under the substantive provisions of the Convention. II.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 2 OF THE CONVENTION 53.

Audrey Glover of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, London.   4.

In particular, as regards cases of unlawful or violent death, the Court has indicated that an applicant should bring such a case to the Court within a matter of months, or at most, depending on the circumstances

Audrey Glover of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.   4.

, in principle, be capable of leading to the establishment of the facts of the case and, if the allegations prove to be true, to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Paul and Audrey

G. and L. refused to make any submissions on the matter. All the police officers refused to take a polygraph test. 38 .

Aubrey Fletcher, ex parte Thompson [1969] 1 WLR 872 and Percy v. DPP - unreported 6 December 1994).   41.

Aubrey- Fletcher, ex parte Thompson [1969] 1 WLR 872; ex parte Benjamin, loc. cit.).

, in principle, be capable of leading to the establishment of the facts of the case and, if the allegations prove to be true, to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Paul and Audrey

, in principle, be capable of leading to the establishment of the facts of the case and, if the allegations prove to be true, to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Paul and Audrey

himself and that they failed to take measures within the scope of their powers which, judged reasonably, might have been expected to avoid that risk (see Keenan , cited above, § 90, and Paul and   Audrey