compatible with Articles   14 and 54   §   1 of the Constitution read in conjunction with Article 31 § 3 (case no.

Article 31 § 3 of the Constitution, which lays down a general prohibition on disproportionate limitations on constitutional rights and freedoms (the principle of proportionality) provides: “Any limitation

    Article 66 of that Code provides: “The investigating judge shall carry out the seizure of all objects, documents, effects and other items referred to in Article 31 § 3”.

Such actions do not benefit from the protection granted to freedom of expression and the right to criticise under Article 31 § 3 of the Constitution or Article 10 § 2 of the Convention.

  » L’article 31 § 3 de la Constitution, qui énonce l’interdiction générale des restrictions disproportionnées aux droits et libertés constitutionnels (principe de proportionnalité), dispose  

The Constitutional Court found ... that the punishment of the offence of offending religious feelings by insulting in public an object of religious worship is, from the point of view of Article 31 § 3

    Article 30 § 2 (2) provided that criminal cases concerning offences specified in Article 31 § 3 of the Code were tried by a federal judge and a panel of twelve jurors at the request of the

Son article 3 prévoit que ses dispositions sont applicables aux délais qui commencent à courir entre la date de sa publication au Journal officiel de la République française, soit le 3 mai 2020, et le

They complained that Article 1 § 1 of the Family and Custody Code was incompatible with Article   47 of the Constitution, in conjunction with Article 31 § 3 and Article   32 §§ 1 and 2 and with

with Article 31 § 3 of the Constitution (the principle of proportionality). 64.

    The relevant provisions of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland read as follows: Article 31 “3.

The Court found that they were in breach of Article 64 § 3 read in conjunction with Articles 2 and 31 § 3 of the Constitution and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention because they had put a disproportionately

    En réponse à l’invitation prévue à l’article 35 § 3 d) du règlement B, le requérant a désigné son conseil (article 31). 3.

31, alinéa 3, de la loi n° 70-1318 du 31 décembre 1970 modifiée ; Mais attendu qu'il ne résulte ni de la décision attaquée, ni du dossier de procédure que le moyen, pris de la violation de l'article

The Court will also consider   “any subsequent practice in the application of the treaty which establishes the agreement of the parties regarding its interpretation” (Article 31 § 3 (b) of the Vienna

as well as with Article 64 §§ 1 and 2 read in conjunction with Article 31 § 3 of the Constitution.” 53.

Article 66 § 1 “The investigating judge shall carry out the seizure of any objects, documents, effects and other items referred to in Article 31 § 3.”

La Cour de cassation doit statuer dans un délai de quinze jours à compter de la date du pourvoi, à défaut de quoi l’inculpé est remis en liberté (article 31 § 3). 23 .

The argument was made that Article 29 should be seen as a relevant rule of international law within the meaning of Article 31 § 3 (c) of the Vienna Convention.