CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

255 résultats pour « accotement impraticable »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0630JUD000523113

Admin. suprême

30 juin 2016

30 juin 2016

The BCEA further noted that the square where the organisers proposed to hold the assembly was a designated public leisure area and that the assembly itself would be impractical. 8.

Source officielle

Page 13 sur 13

← Précédent
CAA

Cour administrative d'appel de Bordeaux

DCA_21BX02856_20240208

Admin. Appel

8 février 2024

8 février 2024

du 10 novembre 2009 a confié au groupement de maîtrise d'œuvre les missions études de diagnostic (DIA), avant-projet (AVP), études de projet (PRO), assistance pour la passation des marchés de travaux (ACT

Source officielle
CAA

Cour administrative d'appel de Bordeaux

DCA_21BX03322_20240208

Admin. Appel

8 février 2024

8 février 2024

du 10 novembre 2009 a confié au groupement de maîtrise d'œuvre les missions études de diagnostic (DIA), avant-projet (AVP), études de projet (PRO), assistance pour la passation des marchés de travaux (ACT

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0307JUD003509009

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2017

7 mars 2017

  In any event, a person deliberately committing a crime must envision that as a result [of the criminal act] he or she may be deprived of liberty.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0330JUD003558908

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2017

30 mars 2017

In view of the variance of the results of the test shots, it was impracticable to identify the relevant carbine on the basis of the striae left on the obturators ... in particular, on account of the elasticity

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0415JUD002888107

Admin. suprême

15 avril 2014

15 avril 2014

all, the presumption that a non-resident citizen is less directly or less continually concerned with his country’s day-to-day problems and has less knowledge of them; secondly, the fact that it is impracticable

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1023JUD002840305

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 2014

23 octobre 2014

The procedure for transferring the sentenced person shall be determined by the normative legal acts of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine [before the amendments of 16 April 2009 – “the Prison Department

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0204JUD003961909

Admin. suprême

4 février 2020

4 février 2020

    The Court considers that significant delays such as in these cases made it impracticable for the experts to provide adequate answers to the questions raised by the requesting authority (see

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0227JUD000569911

Admin. suprême

27 février 2014

27 février 2014

  The relevant provision of the Criminal Code ( Kazneni zakon , Official Gazette no. 110/1997) provides: Article 188 “(1) Whoever forces another person into sexual intercourse or another sexual act

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-123768

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2013

9 juillet 2013

techniques does not violate any Federal statute or other law, where the CIA interrogators do not specifically intend to cause the detainee to undergo severe physical or mental pain or suffering (i.e., they act

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0523JUD003794317

Admin. suprême

23 mai 2024

23 mai 2024

In all cases where the lawyer must provide proof of service and it is impossible to do so by electronic means, he shall act pursuant to subsection 1- bis .” 29 .     Legislative Decree no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1109DEC006033300

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 2006

9 novembre 2006

conclusions of the first instance court and held that no evidence of ill-treatment had been discovered. ii. relevant domestic law Article 117 § 2 (f) of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation penalizes an act

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1108JUD006481201

Admin. suprême

8 novembre 2005

8 novembre 2005

    In November 1998 a new criminal case concerning an act of hooliganism in prison was opened against the applicant, which was later joined to the charges under consideration before the trial

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1211JUD000365305

Admin. suprême

11 décembre 2012

11 décembre 2012

reason formally given by the prosecution for splitting up the case was the concern that the sheer number of defendants involved (more than 100) would prolong the proceedings and that it would be impractical

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0720JUD006026211

Admin. suprême

20 juillet 2017

20 juillet 2017

The BCEA further noted that the square where the organisers proposed to hold the assembly was a designated public leisure area and that the assembly itself would be impractical. 15.

Source officielle